Combining genetic non-invasive sampling with spatially explicit capture-recapture models for density estimation of a patchily distributed small mammal

被引:0
|
作者
Helena Sabino-Marques
Clara Mendes Ferreira
Joana Paupério
Pedro Costa
Soraia Barbosa
Cláudia Encarnação
Russell Alpizar-Jara
Paulo Célio Alves
Jeremy B. Searle
António Mira
Pedro Beja
Ricardo Pita
机构
[1] Universidade de Évora,CIBIO/InBio
[2] Universidade de Évora,UE—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Pólo de Évora
[3] Universidade do Porto,Unidade de Biologia da Conservação, Departamento de Biologia
[4] Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto,CIBIO/InBio—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos
[5] Cornell University,Departamento de Biologia
[6] Universidade de Évora,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
[7] University of Montana,CIMA—Centro de Investigação em Matemática e Aplicações, IIFA, Departamento de Matemática, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia
[8] Universidade de Lisboa,Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences
来源
关键词
Cabrera vole; SECR model; Population biology; Population size estimates; Fragmented habitats; Faecal DNA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Estimating the size of animal populations is essential for understanding the demography and conservation status of species. Genetic Non-Invasive Sampling (gNIS) combined with Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) modelling may provide a practical tool to obtain such estimates. Here, we evaluate for the first time the potential and limitations of this approach to estimate population densities for small mammals inhabiting patchily distributed habitats, focusing on the endemic Iberian Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae). Using 11 highly polymorphic microsatellites and two sex-linked introns, we compared population estimates in November/December 2011 based on live-trapping and gNIS and assessed the impact of distinct consensus criteria to differentiate unique genotypes. Live-trapping over 21 days captured 31 individuals, while gNIS over 5 days recorded 65–69 individuals. SECR models indicated that individual detectability was positively affected by live-trapping capture success on the previous occasion, while for gNIS, it was mainly affected by genotyping success rates and patch size. Live-trapping produced the lowest density estimates (mean ± SE) of 16.6 ± 3.2 individuals per hectare of suitable habitat (ind/ha). Estimates based on gNIS were higher and varied slightly between 25.2 ± 4.0 and 28.8 ± 4.5 ind/ha depending on assuming one or two genotyping errors, respectively, when differentiating individual genetic profiles. Results suggest that live-trapping underestimated the vole population, while the larger number of individuals detected through gNIS allowed better estimates with lower field effort. Overall, we suggest that gNIS combined with SECR models provides an effective tool to estimate small mammal population densities in fragmented habitats.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Combining genetic non-invasive sampling with spatially explicit capture-recapture models for density estimation of a patchily distributed small mammal
    Sabino-Marques, Helena
    Ferreira, Clara Mendes
    Pauperio, Joana
    Costa, Pedro
    Barbosa, Soraia
    Encarnacao, Claudia
    Alpizar-Jara, Russell
    Alves, Paulo Celio
    Searle, Jeremy B.
    Mira, Antonio
    Beja, Pedro
    Pita, Ricardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 64 (04)
  • [2] An evaluation of spatial capture-recapture models applied to ungulate non-invasive genetic sampling data
    Dupont, Pierre P. A.
    Bischof, Richard
    Milleret, Cyril
    Peters, Wibke
    Edelhoff, Hendrik
    Ebert, Cornelia
    Klamm, Alisa
    Hohmann, Ulf
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 87 (03):
  • [3] Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture modelling
    Lindso, Lars K.
    Dupont, Pierre
    Rod-Eriksen, Lars
    Andersskog, Ida Pernille Oystese
    Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes
    Flagstad, Oystein
    Bischof, Richard
    Eide, Nina E.
    OECOLOGIA, 2022, 198 (01) : 139 - 151
  • [4] A non-technical overview of spatially explicit capture-recapture models
    Borchers, David
    JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2012, 152 : S435 - S444
  • [5] Density estimation of tiger and leopard using spatially explicit capture-recapture framework
    Rather, Tahir Ali
    Kumar, Sharad
    Khan, Jamal Ahmad
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [6] An improved procedure to estimate wolf abundance using non-invasive genetic sampling and capture-recapture mixture models
    Caniglia, Romolo
    Fabbri, Elena
    Cubaynes, Sarah
    Gimenez, Olivier
    Lebreton, Jean-Dominique
    Randi, Ettore
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2012, 13 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [7] Leopard Density Estimation within an Enclosed Reserve, Namibia Using Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Models
    Noack, Jenny
    Heyns, Louis
    Rodenwoldt, Diethardt
    Edwards, Sarah
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [8] GENECAP: a program for analysis of multilocus genotype data for non-invasive sampling and capture-recapture population estimation
    Wilberg, MJ
    Dreher, BP
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2004, 4 (04): : 783 - 785
  • [9] Estimating population density of the white-tailed deer in Finland using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture
    Poutanen, Jenni
    Pusenius, Jyrki
    Wikstrom, Mikael
    Brommer, Jon E.
    ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI, 2019, 56 (1-6) : 1 - 16
  • [10] Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches
    Efford, Murray G.
    ECOLOGY, 2011, 92 (12) : 2202 - 2207