Genetic mapping of tuber size distribution and marketable tuber yield under drought stress in potatoes

被引:0
|
作者
Ernest B. Aliche
Marian Oortwijn
Tom P. J. M. Theeuwen
Christian W. B. Bachem
Herman J. van Eck
Richard G. F. Visser
C. Gerard van der Linden
机构
[1] Wageningen University & Research,Plant Breeding
[2] Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences,undefined
来源
Euphytica | 2019年 / 215卷
关键词
Drought; Association panel; Marketable tubers; Size; Modelling; Yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drought sensitivity of potato leads to a reduction in total tuber yield and marketable yield. An investigation of drought effects on tuber yield attributes will facilitate our understanding of how to reduce such huge yield losses. We have evaluated tuber yield, tuber size distribution and marketable yield of a set of 103 European commercial potato cultivars under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions in the field. The multi-year results from two locations, Connantre, France (2013–2015) and Nieuw-Namen in Zeeland, The Netherlands (2013–2014), were analysed. We used Normal and Gamma Distribution models to describe the tuber size distribution of tuber fresh weight and tuber number, respectively. The interactions among parameters of tuber size distribution and total/marketable tuber yield traits were analysed using correlation matrices and biplots. Finally, we used a 14K Infinium SNP marker array to find associations between the parameters or traits and genetic loci on the potato genome. Late foliage maturity facilitated a wider spread of tuber size distribution in favour of larger-sized tubers. Drought effects on total yield were representative of their impact on marketable yield, however, absolute values of total tuber number may not be indicative of marketable number of tubers. We found significant marker-trait associations between a region on chromosome 3 and the spread of tuber number distribution, size class with maximum tuber number and marketable fractions of tuber number and tuber weight. These findings will contribute to improvement and selection for drought tolerance in potato.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Inheritance and genetic mapping of tuber eye depth in cultivated diploid potatoes
    Xiu-Qing Li
    Hielke De Jong
    Darlene M. De Jong
    Walter S. De Jong
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 110 : 1068 - 1073
  • [12] Tuber yield of tree potato cultivars under drought conditions
    da Silva, Giovani O.
    Stoker, Gilberto
    Ponijaleki, Rubens
    Pereira, Arione da S.
    [J]. HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 31 (02) : 216 - 219
  • [13] EFFECT OF TUBER SIZE ON SUSCEPTIBILITY OF POTATOES TO METOXURON
    LUTMAN, PJW
    [J]. POTATO RESEARCH, 1977, 20 (04) : 331 - 335
  • [14] EFFECTS OF SEVERAL MICROBIAL SEEDPIECE TREATMENTS ON EMERGENCE, YIELD, TUBER DEFECTS, TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION, AND SPECIFIC-GRAVITY OF KATAHDIN AND RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES IN MAINE
    PORTER, GA
    MURPHY, HJ
    [J]. AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1983, 60 (03): : 179 - 187
  • [15] EFFECT OF THE SYMBEX SYSTEM ON YIELD, QUALITY, AND TUBER SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF KATAHDIN POTATOES - MAINE - 1979-81
    MORROW, LS
    MURPHY, HJ
    [J]. MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1983, (790): : 1 - 32
  • [16] Evaluation of the effect of density on potato yield and tuber size distribution
    Bussan, Alvin J.
    Mitchell, Paul D.
    Copas, Michael E.
    Drilias, Michael J.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2007, 47 (06) : 2462 - 2472
  • [17] HILL TO HILL VARIATIONS IN TUBER YIELD OF POTATOES IN ALBERTA
    SILVA, GH
    ANDREW, WT
    [J]. AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1985, 62 (03): : 119 - 127
  • [18] INFLUENCE OF ALUMINUM ON PLANT GROWTH AND TUBER YIELD OF POTATOES
    LEE, CR
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1971, 63 (03) : 363 - &
  • [19] TUBER-SIZE DISTRIBUTION
    MARSHALL, B
    THOMPSON, R
    [J]. POTATO RESEARCH, 1986, 29 (02) : 261 - 262
  • [20] Impact of high temperatures on the marketable tuber yield and related traits of potato
    Kim, Yean-Uk
    Seo, Beom-Seok
    Choi, Doug-Hwan
    Ban, Ho-Young
    Lee, Byun-Woo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2017, 89 : 46 - 52