Risk Assessment Method of Subsea Wellhead Instability in Consideration of Uncertain Factors in Deepwater Drilling

被引:0
|
作者
Yuqiang Xu
Zhichuan Guan
Yan Jin
Yongwang Liu
Yuanxiu Sun
Bo Zhang
Yanan Sheng
机构
[1] China University of Petroleum (Beijing),College of Petroleum Engineering
[2] China University of Petroleum (East China),College of Petroleum Engineering
[3] Liaoning Shihua University,College of Petroleum Engineering
关键词
Deepwater drilling; Subsea wellhead mechanical stability; Wellhead instability; Uncertainty analysis; Risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In deepwater drilling, the subsea wellhead is in a complicated stress state and carries the risk of instability. The mechanical stability of subsea wellhead has gradually become one of the key factors in the design and construction of deepwater drilling. In this paper, through the analysis of stress and deformation of subsea wellhead system in deepwater drilling, the characteristic parameters that characterize the mechanical stability of subsea wellhead were determined. On this basis, the influence of different factors on characteristic parameters was analyzed based on dimensionless processing and sensitivity analysis. Factors that were more sensitive and had greater impact on the wellhead mechanical stability of the instance well were screened. Aiming at the problem of greater uncertainty of resistance coefficient, the risk assessment method of subsea wellhead instability considering of uncertain factors was established. Using this method, the wellhead instability risks could be quantitatively evaluated in the drilling process, construction parameters and monitoring values of environmental loads which meet the wellhead safety requirements that could also be proposed. Example shows that: according to the selected parameters such as center value of drag coefficient μ=0.8\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu = 0.8$$\end{document}, fluctuation coefficient of drag coefficient σ=0.05\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sigma = 0.05$$\end{document}, safety limit of subsea wellhead displacement Swm=0.37m\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$S_{\mathrm{wm}} = 0.37\,\hbox {m}$$\end{document}, and safety limit of subsea wellhead deflection angle θwm=3.1∘\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\theta _{\mathrm{wm}} = 3.1{^{\circ }}$$\end{document}, there was 24% probability of occurrence of wellhead instability for the target well. Meanwhile, the platform drift Sw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$S_{\mathrm{w}}$$\end{document} should be < 43 m, and the maximum marine current velocity uw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$u_{\mathrm{w}}$$\end{document} should be < 1.188 m s-1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{-1}$$\end{document}.
引用
收藏
页码:2659 / 2672
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The application of Bayesian - Layer of Protection Analysis method for risk assessment of critical subsea gas compression systems
    Ifelebuegu, Augustine O.
    Awotu-Ukiri, Esiwo O.
    Theophilus, Stephen C.
    Arewa, Andrew O.
    Bassey, Enobong
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2018, 113 : 305 - 318
  • [42] Development of evaluation method of risk of train driver's error with consideration on inducement factors
    Miyachi Y.
    Shibata T.
    [J]. Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan), 2010, 51 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [43] Risk assessment of drilling site operation based on the structural equation and Monte Carlo Method
    Zhao C.
    Yin H.
    Wang B.
    Fan X.
    Wu H.
    [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (02) : 84 - 93
  • [44] A dynamic and quantitative risk assessment method with uncertainties for offshore managed pressure drilling phases
    Zhang, Laibin
    Wu, Shengnan
    Zheng, Wenpei
    Fan, Jianchun
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 104 : 39 - 54
  • [45] An Assessment Method of Sealing Performance and Stress Intensity Factors at Crack Tip of Subsea Connector Metal Sealing Rings
    Wang, Yingying
    Wang, Cong
    Liu, Guoheng
    Zhang, Chong
    Li, Jianchang
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (13)
  • [46] A Data-Driven Method for Risk Assessment of Loop Closing Operation with Uncertain Load
    Yu, Yongsheng
    Liu, Lei
    Wang, Ziying
    Zhu, Liming
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. 2021 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID AND ELECTRICAL AUTOMATION (ICSGEA 2021), 2021, : 1 - 5
  • [47] Risk assessment of oil and gas well drilling activities in Iran - a case study: human factors
    Amir-Heidari, Payam
    Farahani, Hadi
    Ebrahemzadih, Mehrzad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2015, 21 (03) : 276 - 283
  • [48] A synthetic method for service life assessment of steam turbine blade considering many uncertain factors
    Xie, Yonghui
    Zhang, Di
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1135 - 1137
  • [49] Safety risk assessment of railway tunnel construction by drilling and blasting method in complex and dangerous areas
    Zhang F.
    Wu Z.
    Wang X.
    He Y.
    [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20 (05): : 1891 - 1901
  • [50] Risk assessment and the damping measures of the tunnel transfixion section using drilling and blasting construction method
    You, Pengfei
    Mou, Ruifang
    [J]. GEOMECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICS: FROM MICRO TO MACRO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 1141 - 1145