共 50 条
- [48] “Paper Dispenser [Papierspender]”Decision of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) 7 October 2020 – Case No. I ZR 137/19 IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 : 278 - 287
“Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem)Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 74/14
被引：0
|作者：
机构：
关键词：
Patent specification;
Semantic content of a patent claim;
Measures differing in degree;
Linguistic, logical-scientific and technical interpretation;
Prevelance of technical meaning;
D O I：
10.1007/s40319-016-0516-3
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
If, in a patent specification, two measures that differ only in degree (here: blocking and restriction of an air flow) are named without detailed differentiation as the starting point for a problem arising in the state of the art, then it cannot without further justification be concluded from the fact that only the measure with the stronger effect (here: blocking) is mentioned in the patent claim that the measure with weaker effect is not sufficient to embody the protected teaching.
引用
收藏
页码：843 / 847
页数：4
相关论文