Application of Machine Learning to Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Group for Osteoporosis in Individuals Under the Recommended Age for Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

被引:0
|
作者
Hyun Woo Park
Hyojung Jung
Kyoung Yeon Back
Hyeon Ju Choi
Kwang Sun Ryu
Hyo Soung Cha
Eun Kyung Lee
A Ram Hong
Yul Hwangbo
机构
[1] National Cancer Center,Healthcare AI Team
[2] National Cancer Center,Cancer Big Data Center
[3] National Cancer Control Institute,Center for Thyroid Cancer
[4] National Cancer Center,Department of Internal Medicine
[5] Chonnam National University Medical School,undefined
来源
Calcified Tissue International | 2021年 / 109卷
关键词
Osteoporosis; Machine learning; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Bone mineral density;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis; it is generally recommended in men ≥ 70 and women ≥ 65 years old. Therefore, assessment of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis is very important in individuals under the recommended age for DXA. Here, we examine the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based prediction models for osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination. Data of 2210 men aged 50–69 and 1099 women aged 50–64 obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV–V were analyzed. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used to find relevant clinical features and applied to three machine learning models: XGBoost, logistic regression, and a multilayer perceptron. For the prediction of osteoporosis, the XGBoost model using the top 20 features extracted from XGBoost showed the most reliable performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73 and 0.79 in men and women, respectively. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the Shapley additive explanation values based on a risk-score model obtained from XGBoost and conventional osteoporosis risk assessment tools for prediction of osteoporosis using optimal cut-off values for each model. We observed that a cut-off risk score of ≥ 28 in men and ≥ 47 in women was optimal to classify a positive screening for osteoporosis (an AUROC of 0.86 in men and 0.91 in women). The XGBoost-based osteoporosis-prediction model outperformed conventional risk assessment tools. Therefore, machine learning-based prediction models are a more suitable option than conventional risk assessment methods for screening osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 655
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Diagnosed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Are Not Increased in Patients with Gout
    Miller, Karla
    Cannon, Grant
    Register, Kyle
    Grant, Nadia
    Schlesinger, Naomi
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 : 2211 - 2213
  • [22] Total body bone measurements in spinal osteoporosis by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Revilla, RM
    Hernandez, ER
    Villa, LF
    Seco, C
    SanchezAtrio, A
    Rico, H
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 61 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [23] Assessing osteopenia and osteoporosis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry studies in Fabry disease
    Alyaa Shmara
    Grace Lee
    Mania Mgdsyan
    Kathy Hall
    Nadia Sadri
    Angela Martin-Rios
    Kelsey Valentine
    Tatiana Kain
    Madeleine Pahl
    Lynda E. Polgreen
    Virginia Kimonis
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 20 (1)
  • [24] Detecting meaningful body composition changes in athletes using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Colyer, Steffi L.
    Roberts, Simon P.
    Robinson, Jonathan B.
    Thompson, Dylan
    Stokes, Keith A.
    Bilzon, James L. J.
    Salo, Aki I. T.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2016, 37 (04) : 596 - 609
  • [25] Utility of Dual-Energy X-Ray absorptiometry Scanning and Risk of Osteoporosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis; A Prospective Study.
    Magrey, Marina N.
    Khan, Muhammad Asim
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S243 - S244
  • [26] The diagnosis of osteoporosis by standard spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and whole body scans
    Christov, V
    Boyanov, M
    Boneva, Z
    Harangoso, E
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 : S35 - S35
  • [27] Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: The 2007 ISCD Official Positions
    Hans, Didier B.
    Shepherd, John A.
    Schwartz, Elliott N.
    Reid, David M.
    Blake, Glen M.
    Fordham, John N.
    Fuerst, Thomas
    Hadji, Peyman
    Itabashi, Akira
    Krieg, Marc-Antoine
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (01) : 188 - 206
  • [28] Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis after 70 years of age: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, radiography, both, or none?
    Sayegh, Raja A.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2011, 18 (01): : 15 - 16
  • [29] Access to osteoporosis treatment is critically linked to access to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing
    Cadarette, Suzanne M.
    Gignac, Monique A. M.
    Jaglal, Susan B.
    Beaton, Dorcas E.
    Hawker, Gillian A.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (09) : 896 - 901
  • [30] Degeneration of the lumbar spine and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in patients without osteoporosis
    Atalay, Ayce
    Kozakcioglu, Meral
    Cubuk, Rahmi
    Tasali, Nuri
    Guney, Sefik
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2009, 33 (05) : 374 - 378