Modeling urban land use conversion of Daqing City, China: a comparative analysis of “top-down” and “bottom-up” approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Wenliang Li
Changshan Wu
Shuying Zang
机构
[1] College of Heilongjiang Province,Key Laboratory for Remote Sensing Monitoring of Geographic Environment
[2] Harbin Normal University,Department of Geography
[3] University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,undefined
关键词
Urbanization; Stochastic cellular automata; CLUE-S model; Daqing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the past decades, Daqing City, China has experienced unprecedented urban expansion due to the rapid development of petroleum industry. With rapid urbanization and lack of strategic planning, Daqing is facing many socio-economic and environmental problems, and it is essential to examine the process of urbanization, and to develop policy recommendations for sustainable development. To address this problem, this paper examined the urbanization process of Daqing City through developing two multi-level models: an integrated system dynamic (SD) and CLUE-S model (SD-CLUES), and an integrated SD and stochastic cellular automata model (SD-CA). Analysis of results suggests that these two models generate significantly different results. With the SD-CLUES model, new urban developments are clustered in the downtown area or along major transportation networks, indicating exogenous driving forces playing an important role in shaping urban spatial dynamics. With the SD-CA model, on the contrary, the resultant new urban cells are spread over the entire study area, and associated with existing urban areas. Further, visual comparisons and validations indicate that the SD-CA model is a better alternative in explaining the urbanization mechanism of Daqing City. In addition, analysis of results suggests that the stochastic factor in the CA model has significant impact on the modeling accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 828
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling urban land use conversion of Daqing City, China: a comparative analysis of "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches
    Li, Wenliang
    Wu, Changshan
    Zang, Shuying
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 28 (04) : 817 - 828
  • [2] Localising vulnerability assessment to urban floods: A comparative analysis of top-down and bottom-up geospatial approaches in Patna City, India
    Kumari, Nidhi
    Dhiman, Ravinder
    Krishnankutty, Malini
    Kalbar, Pradip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2024, 100
  • [3] COMPARATIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP REGULATION OF BACTERIA
    PACE, ML
    COLE, JJ
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 28 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [4] A Comparative Study of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to Speaker Diarization
    Evans, Nicholas
    Bozonnet, Simon
    Wang, Dong
    Fredouille, Corinne
    Troncy, Raphael
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 20 (02): : 382 - 392
  • [5] Top-down versus bottom-up approaches in proteomics
    Wehr, Tim
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 24 (09) : 1004 - +
  • [7] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Company Competitiveness
    Kotik, Vitezslav
    Voracek, Jan
    15TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS (IFKAD 2020): KNOWLEDGE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 100 - 119
  • [8] General modelling approaches: Top-down or bottom-up?
    Worsley, TE
    Harris, RCE
    NATIONAL TRANSPORT MODELS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 2002, : 57 - 60
  • [9] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP APPROACHES TO PROJECT SELECTION
    不详
    RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, 1978, 21 (02): : 22 - 24
  • [10] The world city network: Evaluating top-down versus bottom-up approaches
    Luthi, Stefan
    Thierstein, Alain
    Hoyler, Michael
    CITIES, 2018, 72 : 287 - 294