Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know

被引:878
|
作者
Wagner M. [1 ]
Scherer C. [1 ]
Alvarez-Muñoz D. [2 ]
Brennholt N. [3 ]
Bourrain X. [4 ]
Buchinger S. [3 ]
Fries E. [5 ]
Grosbois C. [6 ]
Klasmeier J. [7 ]
Marti T. [8 ]
Rodriguez-Mozaz S. [2 ]
Urbatzka R. [9 ]
Vethaak A.D. [10 ]
Winther-Nielsen M. [11 ]
Reifferscheid G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Aquatic Ecotoxicology, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, Frankfurt
[2] Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA), Girona
[3] Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz
[4] Service Etat des Eaux Evaluation Ecologique, Agence de l’Eau Loire-Bretagne, Ploufragan
[5] Water, Environment and Eco-technologies Division, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM), Orléans
[6] GéoHydrosystèmes Continentaux (GéHCO), Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Tours
[7] Institute of Environmental Systems Research, Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück
[8] Investigación y Proyectos Medio Ambiente S.L. (IPROMA), Castellón de la Plana
[9] Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Porto
[10] Unit Marine and Coastal Systems, Deltares and Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam
[11] Environment and Toxicology, DHI, Hørsholm
关键词
Chemistry; Ecotoxicology; Environmental quality; Litter; Microplastics; Monitoring; Plastics; Polymers; Review; Water framework directive;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While the use of plastic materials has generated huge societal benefits, the ‘plastic age’ comes with downsides: One issue of emerging concern is the accumulation of plastics in the aquatic environment. Here, so-called microplastics (MP), fragments smaller than 5 mm, are of special concern because they can be ingested throughout the food web more readily than larger particles. Focusing on freshwater MP, we briefly review the state of the science to identify gaps of knowledge and deduce research needs. State of the science: Environmental scientists started investigating marine (micro)plastics in the early 2000s. Today, a wealth of studies demonstrates that MP have ubiquitously permeated the marine ecosystem, including the polar regions and the deep sea. MP ingestion has been documented for an increasing number of marine species. However, to date, only few studies investigate their biological effects. The majority of marine plastics are considered to originate from land-based sources, including surface waters. Although they may be important transport pathways of MP, data from freshwater ecosystems is scarce. So far, only few studies provide evidence for the presence of MP in rivers and lakes. Data on MP uptake by freshwater invertebrates and fish is very limited. Knowledge gaps: While the research on marine MP is more advanced, there are immense gaps of knowledge regarding freshwater MP. Data on their abundance is fragmentary for large and absent for small surface waters. Likewise, relevant sources and the environmental fate remain to be investigated. Data on the biological effects of MP in freshwater species is completely lacking. The accumulation of other freshwater contaminants on MP is of special interest because ingestion might increase the chemical exposure. Again, data is unavailable on this important issue. Conclusions: MP represent freshwater contaminants of emerging concern. However, to assess the environmental risk associated with MP, comprehensive data on their abundance, fate, sources, and biological effects in freshwater ecosystems are needed. Establishing such data critically depends on a collaborative effort by environmental scientists from diverse disciplines (chemistry, hydrology, ecotoxicology, etc.) and, unsurprisingly, on the allocation of sufficient public funding. © 2014, Wagner et al.; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supervision Training: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Bennett, Susanne
    Deal, Kathleen Holtz
    [J]. SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK, 2012, 82 (2-3) : 195 - 215
  • [32] Pulmonary Rehabilitation WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    Nici, Linda
    Raskin, Jonathan
    Rochester, Carolyn L.
    Bourbeau, Jean C.
    Carlin, Brian W.
    Casaburi, Richard
    Celli, Bartolome R.
    Cote, Claudia
    Crouch, Rebecca H.
    Diez-Morales, Luis E.
    Donner, Claudio F.
    Fahy, Bonnie F.
    Garvey, Chris
    Goldstein, Roger
    Lane-Reticker, Alison
    Lareau, Suzanne C.
    Make, Barry
    Maltais, Francois
    McCormick, James
    Morgan, Michael D. L.
    Ries, Andrew L.
    Troosters, Thierry
    ZuWallack, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2009, 29 (03) : 141 - 151
  • [33] Angioedema: What We Know and What We Need to Know Foreword
    Alam, Rafeul
    [J]. IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 33 (04) : IX - X
  • [34] Nationalism: What We Know and What We Still Need to Know
    Mylonas, Harris
    Tudor, Maya
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 24, 2021, 2021, 24 : 109 - 132
  • [35] BOOK LISTS - WHAT WE KNOW, WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
    BAKER, SL
    [J]. RQ, 1993, 33 (02): : 177 - 180
  • [36] The eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome: What we know, what we think we know and what we need to know
    Clauw, DJ
    Pincus, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1996, 23 : 2 - 6
  • [37] Software Ecosystems: What Do We Need to Know?
    Clear T.
    [J]. ACM Inroads, 2020, 11 (02) : 18 - 20
  • [38] We need to know what we need
    Rose, CF
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (22) : 19 - 20
  • [39] Vitamin A and preterm infants: what we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know
    Mactier, H
    Weaver, LT
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2005, 90 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [40] Cryotherapy for prostate cancer: What we know, what we need to know
    Theodorescu, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (02): : 437 - 438