Machine-learned multi-system surrogate models for materials prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Chandramouli Nyshadham
Matthias Rupp
Brayden Bekker
Alexander V. Shapeev
Tim Mueller
Conrad W. Rosenbrock
Gábor Csányi
David W. Wingate
Gus L. W. Hart
机构
[1] Brigham Young University,Department of Physics and Astronomy
[2] Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society,Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
[3] Skolkovo Innovation Center,Department of Materials Science and Engineering
[4] Johns Hopkins University,Computer Science Department
[5] Engineering Laboratory,undefined
[6] University of Cambridge,undefined
[7] Brigham Young University,undefined
[8] Citrine Informatics,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surrogate machine-learning models are transforming computational materials science by predicting properties of materials with the accuracy of ab initio methods at a fraction of the computational cost. We demonstrate surrogate models that simultaneously interpolate energies of different materials on a dataset of 10 binary alloys (AgCu, AlFe, AlMg, AlNi, AlTi, CoNi, CuFe, CuNi, FeV, and NbNi) with 10 different species and all possible fcc, bcc, and hcp structures up to eight atoms in the unit cell, 15,950 structures in total. We find that the deviation of prediction errors when increasing the number of simultaneously modeled alloys is <1 meV/atom. Several state-of-the-art materials representations and learning algorithms were found to qualitatively agree on the prediction errors of formation enthalpy with relative errors of <2.5% for all systems.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A machine-learned interatomic potential for silica and its relation to empirical models
    Linus C. Erhard
    Jochen Rohrer
    Karsten Albe
    Volker L. Deringer
    [J]. npj Computational Materials, 8
  • [32] Data Descriptor: Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials
    Kim, Edward
    Huang, Kevin
    Tomala, Alex
    Matthews, Sara
    Strubell, Emma
    Saunders, Adam
    McCallum, Andrew
    Olivetti, Elsa
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2017, 4 : 170127
  • [33] Modeling mesoscale energy localization in shocked HMX, part I: machine-learned surrogate models for the effects of loading and void sizes
    A. Nassar
    N. K. Rai
    O. Sen
    H. S. Udaykumar
    [J]. Shock Waves, 2019, 29 : 537 - 558
  • [34] A machine-learned interatomic potential for silica and its relation to empirical models
    Erhard, Linus C.
    Rohrer, Jochen
    Albe, Karsten
    Deringer, Volker L.
    [J]. NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [35] Modeling mesoscale energy localization in shocked HMX, part I: machine-learned surrogate models for the effects of loading and void sizes
    Nassar, A.
    Rai, N. K.
    Sen, O.
    Udaykumar, H. S.
    [J]. SHOCK WAVES, 2019, 29 (04) : 537 - 558
  • [36] Machine-Learned, Biophysical Prediction of Glucose Response for 1,000 Subjects
    Dalal, Parin
    Yazdani, Mehrdad
    Snyder, Michael
    Rahili, Salar
    Torbaghan, Solmaz S.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [37] Fractal analysis and machine-learned decision system for precision and smart farming
    Rashmi Bhardwaj
    Shivam Bhardwaj
    Mohammad Sajid
    [J]. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2021, 230 : 3955 - 3969
  • [38] Robust and scalable uncertainty estimation with conformal prediction for machine-learned interatomic potentials
    Hu, Yuge
    Musielewicz, Joseph
    Ulissi, Zachary W.
    Medford, Andrew J.
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [39] Causal inference for multi-level treatments with machine-learned propensity scores
    Lin, Lin
    Zhu, Yeying
    Chen, Liang
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (2-3) : 106 - 126
  • [40] Minimum standards for evaluating machine-learned models of high-dimensional data
    Chen, Brian H.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN AGING, 2022, 3