The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners

被引:1
|
作者
Mohamed Shaffril H.A. [1 ]
Samsuddin S.F. [2 ]
Abu Samah A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra Infoport, Serdang, 43400, Selangor
[2] Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
[3] Faculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor
关键词
Basic methodology; Beginners; Non-health related studies; Systematic literature review;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is a need for more methodological-based articles on systematic literature review (SLR) for non-health researchers to address issues related to the lack of methodological references in SLR and less suitability of existing methodological guidance. With that, this study presented a beginner's guide to basic methodological guides and key points to perform SLR, especially for those from non-health related background. For that, a total of 75 articles that passed the minimum quality were retrieved using systematic searching strategies. Seven main points of SLR were discussed, namely (1) the development and validation of the review protocol/publication standard/reporting standard/guidelines, (2) the formulation of research questions, (3) systematic searching strategies, (4) quality appraisal, (5) data extraction, (6) data synthesis, and (7) data demonstration. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1346
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Synthesis of guidance available for assessing methodological quality and grading of evidence from qualitative research to inform clinical recommendations: a systematic literature review
    Sekhon, Mandeep
    de Thurah, Annette
    Fragoulis, George E.
    Schoones, Jan
    Stamm, Tanja A.
    Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
    Esbensen, Bente Appel
    Lempp, Heidi
    Bearne, Lindsay
    Kouloumas, Marios
    Pchelnikova, Polina
    Swinnen, Thijs Willem
    Blunt, Chris
    Ferreira, Ricardo J. O.
    Carmona, Loreto
    Nikiphorou, Elena
    RMD OPEN, 2024, 10 (02):
  • [32] Methodological Guidance Papers: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review
    Pigott, Terri D.
    Polanin, Joshua R.
    REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 90 (01) : 24 - 46
  • [33] Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
    Buechter, Roland Brian
    Weise, Alina
    Pieper, Dawid
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review
    Assasi, Nazila
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Tarride, Jean-Eric
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    Goeree, Ron
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (02) : 203 - 220
  • [35] Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
    Roland Brian Büchter
    Alina Weise
    Dawid Pieper
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [36] Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
    Joel J Gagnier
    David Moher
    Heather Boon
    Joseph Beyene
    Claire Bombardier
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12
  • [37] Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research
    Calabro, Andrea
    Vecchiarini, Mariangela
    Gast, Johanna
    Campopiano, Giovanna
    De Massis, Alfredo
    Kraus, Sascha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 21 (03) : 317 - 355
  • [39] Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance
    Guandalini, Ilaria
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 148 : 456 - 471
  • [40] Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Moher, David
    Boon, Heather
    Beyene, Joseph
    Bombardier, Claire
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12