Difference in parenting in two species of burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis and Nicrophorus vespilloides

被引:0
|
作者
Kyle M. Benowitz
Elizabeth C. McKinney
Allen J. Moore
机构
[1] University of Georgia,Department of Genetics
来源
Journal of Ethology | 2016年 / 34卷
关键词
Coleoptera; Repeatability; Social behavior; Variance; Behavioral transitions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Burying beetles (Nicrophorus) are model parents among insects, with all studied species known to regurgitate flesh from vertebrate carcasses to their offspring. However, most studies focus on a very few species, yet the interpretation of the function and importance of care is typically generalized to all burying beetles. Here we characterize subtle variation within and between individuals and sexes, and how this variation differs between two species of burying beetle. We find that Nicrophorus orbicollis exhibits low variance, with a normal distribution of parental care provided during peak care periods. In N. vespilloides, however, the distribution is more uniform as values of care are spread across the possible phenotypic spectrum. This suggests that there is stabilizing selection on care in N. orbicollis, but relaxed or disruptive selection in N. vespilloides. Although repeatability was similar between both species, transitions from other care behaviors into feeding were more common in N. orbicollis than N. vespilloides. Thus, while parenting is coarsely similar across the genus, variation in its expression should not be extrapolated to all Nicrophorus. We suggest that subtle variation both within and among species merits greater attention, and could inform us about the factors that lead to different distributions of care.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 319
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trade-offs between personal immunity and reproduction in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Reavey, Catherine E.
    Warnock, Neil D.
    Vogel, Heiko
    Cotter, Sheena C.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 415 - 423
  • [32] Myotropic activity and immunolocalization of selected neuropeptides of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae)
    Urbanski, Arkadiusz
    Lubawy, Jan
    Marciniak, Pawel
    Rosinski, Grzegorz
    INSECT SCIENCE, 2019, 26 (04) : 656 - 670
  • [33] Sibling competition does not exacerbate inbreeding depression inthe burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Pilakouta, N.
    Sieber, D. J.
    Smiseth, P. T.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (04) : 704 - 710
  • [34] Developmental changes in cellular and humoral responses of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera, Silphidae)
    Urbanski, Arkadiusz
    Czarniewska, Elzbieta
    Baraniak, Edward
    Rosinski, Grzegorz
    JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 60 : 98 - 103
  • [35] Nest construction and its effect on posthatching family life in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Bladon, Eleanor K.
    Kilner, Rebecca M.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 215 : 11 - 22
  • [36] Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis:: the influence of male size on attractiveness to females
    Beeler, AE
    Rauter, CM
    Moore, AJ
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2002, 27 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [37] Alternative tactics and individual reproductive success in natural associations of the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Mueller, Josef K.
    Braunisch, Veronika
    Hwang, Wenbe
    Eggert, Anne-Katrin
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 18 (01) : 196 - 203
  • [38] Octopaminergic gene expression and flexible social behaviour in the subsocial burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Cunningham, C. B.
    Douthit, M. K.
    Moore, A. J.
    INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (03) : 391 - 404
  • [39] Adaptation to monogamy influences parental care but not mating behavior in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides
    Schrader, Matthew
    Keller, Madolin K.
    Lucey, Garrett F.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (13): : 6525 - 6535
  • [40] Secondary Metabolites Released by The Burying Beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides: Chemical Analyses and Possible Ecological Functions
    Thomas Degenkolb
    Rolf-Alexander Düring
    Andreas Vilcinskas
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2011, 37 : 724 - 735