Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information

被引:1
|
作者
M. Kuhn
机构
[1] Geodetic Institute,
[2] University of Karlsruhe,undefined
[3] Englerstrasse 7,undefined
[4] 76128 Karlsruhe,undefined
[5] Germany e-mail: kuhnm@vesta.curtin.edu.au; Tel.: +61-8-9226-7603; Fax: +61-8-9226-2703,undefined
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2003年 / 77卷
关键词
Keywords: Geoid determination – Density hypotheses – Isostatic models – Spherical approximation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 Geoid determination by Stokes's formula requires a complete knowledge of the topographical mass density distribution in order to perform gravity reductions to the geoid boundary. However, deeper masses are also of interest, in order to produce a smooth field of gravity anomalies which will improve results from interpolation procedures. Until now, in most cases a constant mass density has been considered, which is a very rough approximation of reality. The influence on the geoid height coming from different mass density hypotheses given by the isostatic models of Pratt/Hayford, Airy/Heiskanen and Vening Meinesz is studied. Apart from a constant mass density value, additional density information deduced from geological maps and thick sedimentary layers is considered. An overview of how mass density distributions act within Stokes's theory is given. The isostatic models are considered in spherical and planar approximation, as well as with constant and lateral variable mass density of the topographical and deeper masses. Numerical results in a test area in south-west Germany show that the differences in the geoid height due to different density hypotheses can reach a magnitude of more than 1 decimetre, which is not negligible in a precise geoid determination with centimetre accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 65
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Density effects on Rudzki, RTM and Airy-Heiskanen reductions in gravimetric geoid determination
    Bajracharya, S.
    Sideris, M. G.
    DYNAMIC PLANET: MONITORING AND UNDERSTANDING A DYNAMIC PLANET WITH GEODETIC AND OCEANOGRAPHIC TOOLS, 2007, 130 : 397 - +
  • [32] Determination of the geoid figure from the abnormalities of the horizontal gradients of gravity
    Mihal, N
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES DE L URSS, 1937, 16 : 49 - 50
  • [33] GEOID DETERMINATION IN CENTRAL SPAIN FROM GRAVITY AND HEIGHT DATA
    GIL, AJ
    SEVILLA, MJ
    RODRIGUEZCADEROT, G
    BULLETIN GEODESIQUE, 1993, 67 (01): : 41 - 50
  • [34] GEOID DETERMINATION FROM ASTROGEODETRIC, GRAVIMETRIC AND DOPPLER SATELLITE DATA
    JOHN, S
    MUTAJWAA, A
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 21 (05): : 824 - 824
  • [35] Rheological information from geological structures
    Hudleston, PJ
    Lan, LB
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 145 (3-4) : 605 - 620
  • [36] Evolution of Cellular Differentiation: From Hypotheses to Models
    Marquez-Zacarias, Pedro
    Pineau, Rozenn M.
    Gomez, Marcella
    Veliz-Cuba, Alan
    Murrugarra, David
    Ratcliff, William C.
    Niklas, Karl J.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 36 (01) : 49 - 60
  • [37] Rheological Information from Geological Structures
    Pure Appl Geophys, 3-4 (605):
  • [38] ESTIMATING THE DENSITY JUMP AT THE MOHOROVICIC-DISCONTINUITY FROM THE CORRELATION WITH THE GEOID
    PETROVIC, S
    COLIC, K
    MANUSCRIPTA GEODAETICA, 1994, 20 (01): : 46 - 51
  • [39] Geophysical signature of geological units inferred from the analysis of geoid maps in Cameroon and its surroundings
    Kamiguia, J.
    Nouayou, R.
    Tabod, C. T.
    Tadjou, J. M.
    Manguelle-Dicoum, E.
    Kande, H. L.
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2008, 52 (1-2) : 1 - 8
  • [40] Geoid determination using adapted reference field, seismic Moho depths and variable density contrast
    H. A. Abd-Elmotaal
    N. Kühtreiber
    Journal of Geodesy, 2003, 77 : 77 - 85