Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information

被引:1
|
作者
M. Kuhn
机构
[1] Geodetic Institute,
[2] University of Karlsruhe,undefined
[3] Englerstrasse 7,undefined
[4] 76128 Karlsruhe,undefined
[5] Germany e-mail: kuhnm@vesta.curtin.edu.au; Tel.: +61-8-9226-7603; Fax: +61-8-9226-2703,undefined
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2003年 / 77卷
关键词
Keywords: Geoid determination – Density hypotheses – Isostatic models – Spherical approximation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 Geoid determination by Stokes's formula requires a complete knowledge of the topographical mass density distribution in order to perform gravity reductions to the geoid boundary. However, deeper masses are also of interest, in order to produce a smooth field of gravity anomalies which will improve results from interpolation procedures. Until now, in most cases a constant mass density has been considered, which is a very rough approximation of reality. The influence on the geoid height coming from different mass density hypotheses given by the isostatic models of Pratt/Hayford, Airy/Heiskanen and Vening Meinesz is studied. Apart from a constant mass density value, additional density information deduced from geological maps and thick sedimentary layers is considered. An overview of how mass density distributions act within Stokes's theory is given. The isostatic models are considered in spherical and planar approximation, as well as with constant and lateral variable mass density of the topographical and deeper masses. Numerical results in a test area in south-west Germany show that the differences in the geoid height due to different density hypotheses can reach a magnitude of more than 1 decimetre, which is not negligible in a precise geoid determination with centimetre accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 65
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information
    Kuhn, M
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2003, 77 (1-2) : 50 - 65
  • [2] On the Pratt and Airy models of isostatic geoid undulations
    Sjoberg, LE
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 1998, 26 (01) : 137 - 147
  • [3] Models of isostatic and dynamic topography, geoid anomalies, and their uncertainties
    Panasyuk, SV
    Hager, BH
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2000, 105 (B12) : 28199 - 28209
  • [4] Gongola Basin Geoid Determination using Isostatic Models and Seismic Reflection Data and Geophysical Interpretation
    Epuh, E. E.
    Olaleye, J. B.
    Omogunloye, O. G.
    GEOFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL-GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 38 (06): : 137 - 151
  • [5] Lithospheric density structure study by isostatic modelling of the European geoid
    Krysinski, Lech
    Wybraniec, Stanislaw
    Grad, Marek
    STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 2015, 59 (02) : 212 - 252
  • [6] Lithospheric density structure study by isostatic modelling of the European geoid
    Lech Krysiński
    Stanisław Wybraniec
    Marek Grad
    Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2015, 59 : 212 - 252
  • [7] Density modelling for geoid determination
    Kuhn, M
    GRAVITY GEOID AND GEODYNAMICS 2000, 2002, 123 : 271 - 276
  • [8] GEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL INFORMATION AND PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES
    CAMPBELL, KSW
    BARWICK, RE
    GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE, 1988, 125 (03) : 207 - 227
  • [9] DETERMINATION OF DENSITY OF A SIMPLE LAYER DIRECTLY FROM GEOID HEIGHTS
    CHOVITZ, BH
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1974, 79 (20): : 3026 - 3026
  • [10] Modeling topographical density for geoid determination
    Kingdon, Robert
    Vanicek, Petr
    Santos, Marcelo
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2009, 46 (08) : 571 - 585