Confusion between firearms and electrical weapons as a factor in police shootings

被引:0
|
作者
Mark W. Kroll
Judy Melinek
Jeffrey A. Martin
Michael A. Brave
Howard E. Williams
机构
[1] California Polytechnical Institute,Biomedical Engineering
[2] PathologyExpert Inc,School of Criminal Justice and Criminology
[3] DSI,undefined
[4] LAAW International,undefined
[5] LLC,undefined
[6] Texas State University,undefined
关键词
Axon; CEW; ECD; Electrical weapon; Firearm; Gunshot injury; TASER; Weapon confusion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conducted electrical weapons (CEW) have risks including trauma associated with uncontrolled falls, probes penetrating the eye, and fume ignition. A lesser-known risk is weapon-confusion error with officers mistakenly discharging their firearm when they intended to deploy their electrical weapon. We searched for incidents of possible weapon confusion with the TASER® brand CEWs via open-source media, litigation filings, and a survey of CEW law enforcement master instructors. We found 19 incidents of possible CEW weapon confusion in law enforcement field uses from January 2001 to April 2021. We eliminated a case as not meeting our criteria for probable weapons confusion leaving 18 cases, thus giving a demonstrated CEW discharge risk of 3.9 per million with confidence limits (2.4–6.2 per million) by Wilson score interval. Ipsilateral carry of the weapons was historically correlated with increased risk vs. contralateral carry. Officer gender was not a predictor of weapon confusion. The psychological issues behind weapon confusion under stress are discussed. The concurrent carry of electrical weapons and firearms presents a very small but real risk of injury and death from confusion between an electrical weapon and a firearm.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 287
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条