Systematic review of effects on biodiversity from oil palm production

被引:93
|
作者
Savilaakso S. [1 ]
Garcia C. [2 ,5 ]
Garcia-Ulloa J. [2 ]
Ghazoul J. [2 ]
Groom M. [3 ,4 ]
Guariguata M.R. [1 ]
Laumonier Y. [1 ,5 ]
Nasi R. [1 ]
Petrokofsky G. [6 ]
Snaddon J. [6 ]
Zrust M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Center for International Forestry Research, P.O. Box 0113 BOCBD, Bogor
[2] Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, Zurich
[3] Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Bothell, 18115 Campus Way NE, Bothell
[4] Program on the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle
[5] CIRAD, Research Unit Goods and Services of Tropical Forest Ecosystems, Avenue Agropolis, Montpellier Cedex 5
[6] Biodiversity Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford
[7] Zoological Society of London, Indonesia Programme, Jl. Gunung Gede 1 No.11A, Bogor
关键词
Land use change; Mitigation; Oil palm; Species diversity; Tropical forest;
D O I
10.1186/2047-2382-3-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: During the past decade there has been a growing interest in bioenergy, driven by concerns about global climate change, growing energy demand, and depleting fossil fuel reserves. The predicted rise in biofuel demand makes it important to understand the potential consequences of expanding biofuel cultivation. A systematic review was conducted on the biodiversity impacts of three first-generation biofuel crops (oil palm, soybean, and jatropha) in the tropics. The study focused on the impacts on species richness, abundance (total number of individuals or occurrences), community composition, and ecosystem functions related to species richness and community composition. Methods: Literature was searched using an a priori protocol. Owing to a lack of available studies of biodiversity impacts from soybean and jatropha that met the inclusion criteria set out in the systematic review protocol, all analyses focused on oil palm. The impacts of oil palm cultivation on species richness, abundance, and community similarity were summarized quantitatively; other results were summarized narratively. Results: The searches returned 9143 articles after duplicate removal of which 25 met the published inclusion criteria and were therefore accepted for the final review. Twenty of them had been conducted in Malaysia and two thirds were on arthropods. Overall, oil palm plantations had reduced species richness compared with primary and secondary forests, and the composition of species assemblages changed significantly after forest conversion to oil palm plantation. Abundance showed species-specific responses and hence, the overall abundance was not significantly different between plantations and forest areas. Only one study reported how different production systems (smallholdings vs. industrial estates) affect biodiversity. No studies that examined the effects on ecosystem functions of reduced species richness or changes in community composition met the inclusion criteria. Neither were there studies that reported how areas managed under different standards (e.g. different certification systems) affect biodiversity and ecosystem function. Conclusions: Our review suggests that oil palm plantations have reduced species richness compared with primary and secondary forests, and the composition of species assemblage changes significantly after forest conversion to oil palm plantation. Effects of different production systems on biodiversity and ecosystem function are clear knowledge gaps that should be addressed in future research. Trial registration: CEE10-013 © 2014 Savilaakso et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determinants of palm oil consumption in food products: A systematic review
    Savarese, Mariarosaria
    Castellini, Greta
    Paleologo, Michele
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS, 2022, 96
  • [22] Occupational Health and Safety in the Palm Oil Industry: A Systematic Review
    Myzabella, Nuruly
    Fritschi, Lin
    Merdith, Nick
    El-Zaemey, Sonia
    Chih, HuiJun
    Reid, Alison
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 10 (04): : 159 - 173
  • [23] Systematic review of palm oil consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease
    Ismail, Sophia Rasheeqa
    Maarof, Siti Khuzaimah
    Ali, Syazwani Siedar
    Ali, Azizan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [24] Palm Oil in Myanmar: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Effects of Industrial Farming on Biodiversity Loss
    Nicholas, Khristopher
    Fanzo, Jessica
    MacManus, Kytt
    GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 6 (01): : 210 - 222
  • [25] How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?
    Fitzherbert, Emily B.
    Struebig, Matthew J.
    Morel, Alexandra
    Danielsen, Finn
    Bruehl, Carsten A.
    Donald, Paul F.
    Phalan, Ben
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (10) : 538 - 545
  • [26] A review on recent technological advancement in the activated carbon production from oil palm wastes
    Rashidi, Nor Adilla
    Yusup, Suzana
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 314 : 277 - 290
  • [27] Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil, Its By-Products, and Mill Effluent: A Review
    Zahan, Khairul Azly
    Kano, Manabu
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (08):
  • [28] Improving Sustainability of Palm Oil Production by Increasing Oil Extraction Rate: a Review
    Chien Lye Chew
    Chun Yong Ng
    Wai Onn Hong
    Ta Yeong Wu
    Yee-Ying Lee
    Liang Ee Low
    Pei San Kong
    Eng Seng Chan
    Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2021, 14 : 573 - 586
  • [29] Improving Sustainability of Palm Oil Production by Increasing Oil Extraction Rate: a Review
    Chew, Chien Lye
    Ng, Chun Yong
    Hong, Wai Onn
    Wu, Ta Yeong
    Lee, Yee-Ying
    Low, Liang Ee
    Kong, Pei San
    Chan, Eng Seng
    FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 14 (04) : 573 - 586
  • [30] A review of torrefaction of oil palm solid wastes for biofuel production
    Sukiran, Mohamad Azri
    Abnisa, Faisal
    Daud, Wan Mohd Ashri Wan
    Abu Bakar, Nasrin
    Loh, Soh Kheang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 149 : 101 - 120