Towards AI ethics’ institutionalization: knowledge bridges from business ethics to advance organizational AI ethics

被引:0
|
作者
Mario D. Schultz
Peter Seele
机构
[1] USI Università della Svizzera italiana,Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics, Ethics and Communication Law Center (ECLC)
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 1期
关键词
AI ethics; Business ethics; AI ethics washing; Stakeholder management; Standardized reporting; Corporate governance and regulation; Curriculum accreditation;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00150-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper proposes to generate awareness for developing Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics by transferring knowledge from other fields of applied ethics, particularly from business ethics, stressing the role of organizations and processes of institutionalization. With the rapid development of AI systems in recent years, a new and thriving discourse on AI ethics has (re-)emerged, dealing primarily with ethical concepts, theories, and application contexts. We argue that business ethics insights may generate positive knowledge spillovers for AI ethics, given that debates on ethical and social responsibilities have been adopted as voluntary or mandatory regulations for organizations in both national and transnational contexts. Thus, business ethics may transfer knowledge from five core topics and concepts researched and institutionalized to AI ethics: (1) stakeholder management, (2) standardized reporting, (3) corporate governance and regulation, (4) curriculum accreditation, and as a unified topic (5) AI ethics washing derived from greenwashing. In outlining each of these five knowledge bridges, we illustrate current challenges in AI ethics and potential insights from business ethics that may advance the current debate. At the same time, we hold that business ethics can learn from AI ethics in catching up with the digital transformation, allowing for cross-fertilization between the two fields. Future debates in both disciplines of applied ethics may benefit from dialog and cross-fertilization, meant to strengthen the ethical depth and prevent ethics washing or, even worse, ethics bashing.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:99 / 111
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trust and ethics in AI
    Choung, Hyesun
    David, Prabu
    Ross, Arun
    AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (02) : 733 - 745
  • [32] Preface: AI Ethics
    Mehta, Sameep
    Rossi, Francesca
    Varshney, Kush R.
    IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 63 (4-5)
  • [33] AI assisted ethics
    Etzioni, Amitai
    Etzioni, Oren
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 18 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [34] AI assisted ethics
    Amitai Etzioni
    Oren Etzioni
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2016, 18 : 149 - 156
  • [35] Trust and ethics in AI
    Hyesun Choung
    Prabu David
    Arun Ross
    AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 : 733 - 745
  • [36] AI Ethics Is Not a Panacea
    McLennan, Stuart
    Lee, Meredith M.
    Fiske, Amelia
    Celi, Leo Anthony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (11): : 20 - 22
  • [37] The ethics of AI in the lab
    Chemical and Engineering News, 2023, 101 (31): : 30 - 35
  • [38] Ethics of AI in medicine
    Maio, Giovanni
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 149 (14) : 846 - 853
  • [39] The Ethics of AI in Games
    Melhart, David
    Togelius, Julian
    Mikkelsen, Benedikte
    Holmgard, Christoffer
    Yannakakis, Georgios N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, 2024, 15 (01) : 79 - 92
  • [40] Ethics by design in AI
    Martin C.D.
    Makoundou T.T.
    1600, Association for Computing Machinery (08): : 35 - 37