Reliability principles, methodology and methods for lifetime design

被引:0
|
作者
Asko Sarja
机构
[1] Innokas Consulting,
来源
Materials and Structures | 2010年 / 43卷
关键词
Integrated lifetime design; Generic limit states; Lifetime quality; Lifetime safety factor; Durability; Usability; Obsolescence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of integrated lifetime design is to predict and optimise the lifetime quality of the designed facility (building, bridge, tunnel, harbour, road, railway, airport, etc.). Lifetime quality means the capability of a facility or its structures to fulfil the requirements of its users, owners and society over its entire planning and design life (usually 50–100 years). The dictating phase for optimising the lifetime quality of a facility or structure is the planning and design phase, when the degree of freedom is high, and the cost of the phase is low. Generic limit state design aims to fulfil the generic requirements of lifetime quality. At the integrated planning and design stage, performance-based and generic structural limit states design includes the following three classes: (1) Static and dynamic modelling and design against mechanical loads; (2) Durability and service life modelling and design against degrading physical, chemical and biological loads; (3) Usability and service life modelling and design against obsolescence loads. As static and dynamic design are comprehensively dealt with in the literature and in practice, this report focuses on the lifetime safety factor method for durability design and obsolescence design. Main focus of this article is in durability design. On the obsolescence design are presented only a short summary and a number of references, because this design is not much connected to materials research.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability principles, methodology and methods for lifetime design
    Sarja, Asko
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2010, 43 (1-2) : 261 - 271
  • [2] A New Reliability Evaluation Methodology With Application to Lifetime Oriented Circuit Design
    Sajjadi-Kia, Hamed
    Ababei, Cristinel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEVICE AND MATERIALS RELIABILITY, 2013, 13 (01) : 192 - 202
  • [3] Principles of robust design methodology
    Arvidsson, Martin
    Gremyr, Ida
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 24 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [4] Integrated reliability prediction methodology - Principles and practice
    Talmor, M
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 295 - 300
  • [5] A Methodology for Consideration of Uncertainty in Lifetime Design of Experiments
    Kremer, Alexander
    Bertsche, Bernd
    2019 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2019) - R & M IN THE SECOND MACHINE AGE - THE CHALLENGE OF CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [6] AMS and RF Design for Reliability Methodology
    Ferreira, Pietro M.
    Petit, Herve
    Naviner, Jean-Francois
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2010, : 3657 - 3660
  • [7] A Review of Reliability Principles in Conceptual Design
    Cui, Yu Lian
    Wu, Wei
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL DESIGN, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 199-200 : 583 - +
  • [8] An analysis on induction motor reliability and lifetime estimation methods
    Mamchur, Dmytro
    Husach, Serhii
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2020, 96 (12): : 218 - 221
  • [9] University methodology for internetworking principles and design projects
    Abler, RT
    Owen, HL
    Riley, GF
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2003, 46 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [10] PRINCIPLES OF A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR INDUSTRIAL WORKPLACES DESIGN
    Bures, Marek
    ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2009 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM, 2009, 20 : 515 - 516