Impact of the arc length on GNSS analysis results

被引:0
|
作者
Simon Lutz
Michael Meindl
Peter Steigenberger
Gerhard Beutler
Krzysztof Sośnica
Stefan Schaer
Rolf Dach
Daniel Arnold
Daniela Thaller
Adrian Jäggi
机构
[1] Federal Office of Topography (swisstopo),Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry
[2] ETH Zürich,Deutsches Zentrum für Luft
[3] German Space Operations Center, und Raumfahrt
[4] University of Bern,Astronomical Institute
[5] Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences,Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics
[6] Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie,undefined
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2016年 / 90卷
关键词
GPS; GLONASS; Orbits; Earth orientation parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Homogeneously reprocessed combined GPS/GLONASS 1- and 3-day solutions from 1994 to 2013, generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the frame of the second reprocessing campaign REPRO-2 of the International GNSS Service, as well as GPS- and GLONASS-only 1- and 3-day solutions for the years 2009 to 2011 are analyzed to assess the impact of the arc length on the estimated Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP, namely polar motion and length of day), on the geocenter, and on the orbits. The conventional CODE 3-day solutions assume continuity of orbits, polar motion components, and of other parameters at the day boundaries. An experimental 3-day solution, which assumes continuity of the orbits, but independence from day to day for all other parameters, as well as a non-overlapping 3-day solution, is included into our analysis. The time series of EOPs, geocenter coordinates, and orbit misclosures, are analyzed. The long-arc solutions were found to be superior to the 1-day solutions: the RMS values of EOP and geocenter series are typically reduced between 10 and 40 %, except for the polar motion rates, where RMS reductions by factors of 2–3 with respect to the 1-day solutions are achieved for the overlapping and the non-overlapping 3-day solutions. In the low-frequency part of the spectrum, the reduction is even more important. The better performance of the orbits of 3-day solutions with respect to 1-day solutions is also confirmed by the validation with satellite laser ranging.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 378
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] GNSS Timing Performance Assessment and Results Analysis
    Zhu, Lin
    Zhang, Huijun
    Li, Xiaohui
    Zhu, Feng
    Liu, Yinhua
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (07)
  • [12] ARC LENGTH
    GOFFMAN, C
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1964, 71 (03): : 303 - &
  • [13] Arc Length
    梁宇学
    中学生数学, 2019, (13) : 31 - 32
  • [14] DME/TACAN Impact Analysis on GNSS Reflectometry
    Onrubia, Raul
    Querol, Jorge
    Pascual, Daniel
    Alonso-Arroyo, Alberto
    Park, Hyuk
    Camps, Adriano
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 9 (10) : 4611 - 4620
  • [15] ANALYSIS OF THE GMAW PROCESS FOR MICROPROCESSOR CONTROL OF ARC LENGTH
    KANNATEYASIBU, E
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (02): : 172 - 176
  • [16] First results of the Nordic and Baltic GNSS Analysis Centre
    Lahtinen, Sonja
    Pasi, Hakli
    Jivall, Lotti
    Kempe, Christina
    Kollo, Karin
    Kosenko, Ksenija
    Pihlak, Priit
    Prizginiene, Dalia
    Tangen, Oddvar
    Weber, Mette
    Parseliunas, Eimuntas
    Baniulis, Rimvydas
    Galinauskas, Karolis
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [17] Impact of ambiguity resolution and arc length on regional precise orbit determination
    Lou Y.
    Yao X.
    Liu Y.
    Zheng F.
    2016, Editorial Board of Medical Journal of Wuhan University (41): : 249 - 254
  • [18] Measurement and analysis on the thermal and mechanical transfer characteristics of GTA arc affected by arc length
    Chen, Dong
    Cai, Yuhua
    Luo, Yi
    Wang, Xinxin
    Chi, Luxin
    Tang, Fanshun
    MEASUREMENT, 2020, 153
  • [19] A note on arc length
    Patyi, Imre
    TEACHING MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2009, 28 (03): : 109 - 112
  • [20] ARC LENGTH PROBLEM
    LEWIS, JL
    JOURNAL OF THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY-SECOND SERIES, 1976, 12 (48): : 469 - 474