A comparative crossover study on the treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm: preseptal and pretarsal botulinum toxin injection techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Praween Lolekha
Arthita Choolam
Kongkiat Kulkantrakorn
机构
[1] Thammasat University,Neurology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Thammasat University,Stroke and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Chulabhorn Hospital,Department of Medicine
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2017年 / 38卷
关键词
Hemifacial spasm; Blepharospasm; Botulinum toxin; Pretarsal; Preseptal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hemifacial spasm (HFS) and benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) are chronic and disabling abnormal craniofacial movements that produce involuntary eyelid twitching and closure. The efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections have been accepted and widely used for the treatment of HFS and BEB. However, different injection sites may influence the effectiveness, doses, and side effects. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and complications of low-dose BoNT-A injections between injection at the preseptal (PS) and the pretarsal (PT) portion of the orbicularis oculi muscle. A total of 40 patients, 31 patients with HFS and 9 patients with BEB, participated in this study. Each patient received both PS and PT BoNT-A injections in a crossover design study. Latency to response, duration of improvement, the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS), self-response scale, patient satisfaction scale, and complications were compared. Low-dose injections of BoNT-A at the PT portion produced a significantly higher response rate in terms of latency to response, duration of improvement, JRS, self-response scale, and patient satisfaction scale than the PS injections. Major side effects including ptosis and droopy eyelid were observed only after the PS injections. These findings confirmed that low-dose injections of BoNT-A at the PT portion provide more efficacy, patient satisfaction, and fewer complications than the PS injections for the treatment of involuntary eyelid twitching and closure in patients with HFS and BEB.
引用
收藏
页码:2031 / 2036
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Successful treatment in primary blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm by botulinum toxin A
    Aiba, S.
    Tatsumoto, M.
    Hirata, K.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (07) : S228 - S228
  • [22] Treatment of blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm and facial synkinesis with botulinum toxin
    Winterhoff, J.
    Laskawi, R.
    HNO, 2012, 60 (06) : 479 - 483
  • [23] BOTULINUM-A TOXIN INJECTION IN PATIENTS WITH BLEPHAROSPASM, TORTICOLLIS AND HEMIFACIAL SPASM
    BERARDELLI, A
    CARTA, A
    STOCCHI, F
    FORMICA, A
    AGNOLI, A
    MANFREDI, M
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1990, 11 (06): : 589 - 593
  • [24] Botulinum toxin A injection in the treatment of hemifacial spasm
    Chen, RS
    Lu, CS
    Tsai, CH
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 94 (03): : 207 - 211
  • [25] TREATMENT OF BLEPHAROSPASM AND HEMIFACIAL SPASM WITH BOTULINUM-A TOXIN - A CANADIAN MULTICENTER STUDY
    TAYLOR, JDN
    KRAFT, SP
    KAZDAN, MS
    FLANDERS, M
    CADERA, W
    ORTON, RB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1991, 26 (03): : 133 - 138
  • [26] Complications of Preseptal Versus Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Benign Essential Blepharospasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sanguandikul, Lalita
    Apinyawasisuk, Supanut
    Jariyakosol, Supharat
    Hirunwiwatkul, Parima
    Chongpison, Yuda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 232 : 9 - 16
  • [27] Botulinum toxin treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm: Objective response evaluation
    Thussu, A
    Barman, CR
    Prabhakar, S
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 1999, 47 (03) : 206 - 209
  • [28] The Effectiveness of Chemical Denervation with Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm
    Ciftci, Ferda
    Karadayi, Koray
    Yildiz, Tamer
    Akin, Tugrul
    Yildirim, Yildiray
    Gulecek, Oguz
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 35 (02): : 84 - 92