Navigation Accuracy Guidelines for Orbital Formation Flying

被引:0
|
作者
J. Russell Carpenter
Kyle T. Alfriend
机构
[1] NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch, Code 595
[2] Texas A&M University,Aerospace Engineering Dept.
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03546351
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Some simple guidelines based on the accuracy in determining a satellite formation’s semimajor axis differences are useful in making preliminary assessments of the navigation accuracy needed to support such missions. These guidelines are valid for any elliptical orbit, regardless of eccentricity. Although maneuvers required for formation establishment, reconfiguration, and station-keeping require accurate prediction of the state estimate to the maneuver time, and hence are directly affected by errors in all the orbital elements, experience has shown that determination of orbit plane orientation and orbit shape to acceptable levels is less challenging than the determination of orbital period or semimajor axis. Furthermore, any differences among the members’ semimajor axes are undesirable for a satellite formation, since they will lead to differential in-track drift due to period differences. Since inevitable navigation errors prevent these differences from ever being zero, one may use the guidelines this paper presents to determine how much drift will result from a given relative navigation accuracy, or conversely what navigation accuracy is required to limit drift to a given value. Since the guidelines do not account for perturbations, they may be viewed as useful preliminary design tools, rather than as the basis for mission navigation requirements, which should be based on detailed analysis of the mission configuration, including all relevant sources of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Vision-based Integrated Navigation System and Optimal Allocation in Formation Flying
    Giribet, Juan I.
    Mas, Ignacio
    Moreno, Patricio
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2018, : 52 - 61
  • [42] Relative Navigation for Formation Flying Spacecrafts Using X-ray Pulsars
    Wu, Falin
    Sui, Xiaohong
    Zhao, Yan
    Zhang, Yun
    [J]. 2012 IEEE/ION POSITION LOCATION AND NAVIGATION SYMPOSIUM (PLANS), 2012, : 1289 - 1292
  • [43] Radio-frequency sensor fusion for relative navigation of formation flying satellites
    Allende-Alba, Gerardo
    D'Amico, Simone
    Montenbruck, Oliver
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPACE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (02) : 129 - 147
  • [44] Observability-based Mars Autonomous Navigation Using Formation Flying Spacecraft
    Ou, Yangwei
    Zhang, Hongbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2018, 71 (01): : 21 - 43
  • [45] FORMATION FLYING: RELATIVE ORBITS' MODELLING AND CONTROL THROUGH EULERIAN ORBITAL ELEMENTS
    Gaias, Gabriella V. M.
    Lavagna, Michele R.
    Golikov, Alexei R.
    Ovchinnikov, Michael Yu.
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2009, VOL 134, PTS I-III, 2009, 134 : 1271 - +
  • [46] Autonomous Formation Flying using X-Ray Pulsar Based Navigation
    Chen Zhengmin
    Huang Xianlin
    Lu Hongqian
    [J]. 2011 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2011,
  • [47] Distance-based relative orbital elements determination for formation flying system
    He, Yanchao
    Xu, Ming
    Chen, Xi
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 118 : 109 - 122
  • [48] Determination and Estimation of Differential Mean Orbital Elements for Formation-Flying Missions
    Wang, Kai
    Chen, Tong
    Xu, Shijie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2014, 37 (01) : 86 - 97
  • [49] NAVIGATION SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL FLYING
    THOMSON, JM
    [J]. AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 75 (721): : 73 - &
  • [50] Scaled-model guidelines for formation-flying solar coronagraph missions
    Landini, Federico
    Romoli, Marco
    Baccani, Cristian
    Focardi, Mauro
    Pancrazzi, Maurizio
    Galano, Damien
    Kirschner, Volker
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2016, 41 (04) : 757 - 760