Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection

被引:0
|
作者
Jan Hubert
Frank Timo Beil
Tim Rolvien
Christian Ries
Stephan Frosch
Dominik Saul
Thelonius Hawellek
机构
[1] University Medical Center Göttingen,Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery
[2] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Department of Orthopaedics
[3] Mayo Clinic,Kogod Center On Aging and Division of Endocrinology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty (RA) is a well-established surgical procedure in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), whereby a higher failure rate of final hip geometry restoration due to tissue contraction is controversially discussed. The aim was to evaluate radiographic changes of hip geometry parameters during PJI treatment and to determine the impact of the intermediate RA on the final joint restoration after reimplantation of a total hip arthroplasty (reTHA). Radiographic parameters (leg length (LL), femoral offset (FO), horizontal/vertical acetabular center of rotation distance (h/vCORD)) of 47 patients (mean age: 64.1 years) were measured on standard radiographs of the pelvis and compared between four different stages during PJI treatment (pre-replacement status (preTHA), primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), RA and reTHA). The RA duration (mean: 10.9 months) and the number of reoperations during this period (mean: n = 2.0) as well as their impact on hip geometry restoration were evaluated. Between preTHA and pTHA/reTHA an equivalent restoration was measured regarding the FO (p < 0.001/p < 0.001) and hCORD (p = 0.016/p < 0.001), but not regarding the LL and vCORD. In contrast, analysis revealed no influence of RA and an equivalent reconstruction of LL (p = 0.003), FO (p < 0.001), v/hCORD (p = 0.039/p = 0.035) at reTHA compared to pTHA. Furthermore, RA duration (p = 0.053) and the number of reoperations after RA (p = 0.134) had no impact on radiographic hip geometry restoration. The two-stage exchange with intermediate RA does not alter the preexisting hip joint parameters, whereby a good restoration of the final hip geometry, independent of the duration or the number of reoperations, can be achieved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Christian Hipfl
    Vincent Leopold
    Luis Becker
    Matthias Pumberger
    Carsten Perka
    Sebastian Hardt
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 4481 - 4490
  • [22] Two-stage hip revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection without the use of spacer or cemented implants
    Yves Gramlich
    Paul Hagebusch
    Philipp Faul
    Alexander Klug
    Gerhard Walter
    Reinhard Hoffmann
    International Orthopaedics, 2019, 43 : 2457 - 2466
  • [23] Two-stage hip revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection without the use of spacer or cemented implants
    Gramlich, Yves
    Hagebusch, Paul
    Faul, Philipp
    Klug, Alexander
    Walter, Gerhard
    Hoffmann, Reinhard
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (11) : 2457 - 2466
  • [24] The direct anterior approach: treating periprosthetic joint infection of the hip using two-stage revision arthroplasty
    Thaler, Martin
    Lechner, Ricarda
    Dammerer, Dietmar
    Leitner, Hermann
    Khosravi, Ismail
    Nogler, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) : 255 - 262
  • [25] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Hipfl, Christian
    Leopold, Vincent
    Becker, Luis
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Perka, Carsten
    Hardt, Sebastian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4481 - 4490
  • [26] Two-stage revision arthroplasty for coagulase-negative staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee
    Veltman, Ewout S.
    Moojen, Dirk Jan F.
    van Ogtrop, Marc L.
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 10 (10): : 348 - 355
  • [27] Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
    Steinicke, A. C.
    Schwarze, J.
    Gosheger, G.
    Moellenbeck, B.
    Ackmann, T.
    Theil, C.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (04) : 1731 - 1740
  • [28] Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?
    A. C. Steinicke
    J. Schwarze
    G. Gosheger
    B. Moellenbeck
    T. Ackmann
    C. Theil
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 1731 - 1740
  • [29] Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods
    Vcelak, J.
    Macko, M.
    Kubes, R.
    Nemec, K.
    Frydrychova, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2018, 85 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [30] Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Is a Favorable Treatment Option Upon Diagnosis of a Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    Goswami, Karan
    Shohat, Noam
    Blevins, Kier
    Rondon, Alexander J.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (11): : 3555 - 3560