Microgravity and evasion of plant innate immunity by human bacterial pathogens

被引:0
|
作者
Noah Totsline
Kalmia E. Kniel
Harsh P. Bais
机构
[1] University of Delaware,Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, AP Biopharma
[2] University of Delaware,Department of Animal and Food Sciences
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spaceflight microgravity and modeled-microgravity analogs (MMA) broadly alter gene expression and physiology in both pathogens and plants. Research elucidating plant and bacterial responses to normal gravity or microgravity has shown the involvement of both physiological and molecular mechanisms. Under true and simulated microgravity, plants display differential expression of pathogen-defense genes while human bacterial pathogens exhibit increased virulence, antibiotic resistance, stress tolerance, and reduced LD50 in animal hosts. Human bacterial pathogens including Salmonella enterica and E. coli act as cross-kingdom foodborne pathogens by evading and suppressing the innate immunity of plants for colonization of intracellular spaces. It is unknown if evasion and colonization of plants by human pathogens occurs under microgravity and if there is increased infection capability as demonstrated using animal hosts. Understanding the relationship between microgravity, plant immunity, and human pathogens could prevent potentially deadly outbreaks of foodborne disease during spaceflight. This review will summarize (1) alterations to the virulency of human pathogens under microgravity and MMA, (2) alterations to plant physiology and gene expression under microgravity and MMA, (3) suppression and evasion of plant immunity by human pathogens under normal gravity, (4) studies of plant-microbe interactions under microgravity and MMA. A conclusion suggests future study of interactions between plants and human pathogens under microgravity is beneficial to human safety, and an investment in humanity’s long and short-term space travel goals.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recognition of bacterial plant pathogens: local, systemic and transgenerational immunity
    Henry, Elizabeth
    Yadeta, Koste A.
    Coaker, Gitta
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2013, 199 (04) : 908 - 915
  • [32] Molecular mechanisms employed by enteric bacterial pathogens to antagonise host innate immunity
    Gan, Jiyao
    Giogha, Cristina
    Hartland, Elizabeth L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 : 58 - 64
  • [33] Subterfuge and Sabotage: Evasion of Host Innate Defenses by Invasive Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens
    Okumura, Cheryl Y. M.
    Nizet, Victor
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, VOL 68, 2014, 68 : 439 - 458
  • [34] Inflammasome activation and evasion by bacterial pathogens
    Ta, Atri
    Vanaja, Sivapriya Kailasan
    CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 68 : 125 - 133
  • [35] Innate Immunity and Immune Evasion by Enterovirus 71
    Pathinayake, Prabuddha S.
    Hsu, Alan C-Y.
    Wark, Peter A. B.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2015, 7 (12): : 6613 - 6630
  • [36] Evasion of Innate and Adaptive Immunity by Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Goldberg, Michael F.
    Saini, Neeraj K.
    Porcelli, Steven A.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2014, 2 (05):
  • [37] Social evolution of innate immunity evasion in a virus
    Domingo-Calap, Pilar
    Segredo-Otero, Ernesto
    Duran-Moreno, Maria
    Sanjuan, Rafael
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (06) : 1006 - 1013
  • [38] Social evolution of innate immunity evasion in a virus
    Pilar Domingo-Calap
    Ernesto Segredo-Otero
    María Durán-Moreno
    Rafael Sanjuán
    Nature Microbiology, 2019, 4 : 1006 - 1013
  • [39] Role of Cyclic di-GMP in the Bacterial Virulence and Evasion of the Plant Immunity
    Martinez-Gil, Marta
    Ramos, Cayo
    CURRENT ISSUES IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 199 - 221
  • [40] Innate immunity in Drosophila:: Pathogens and pathways
    Govind, Shubha
    INSECT SCIENCE, 2008, 15 (01) : 29 - 43