Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?

被引:0
|
作者
Yukie Sato
Heike Staudacher
Maurice W. Sabelis
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics
[2] University of Tsukuba,Sugadaira Montane Research Center
来源
关键词
Heterospecific mating; Inbreeding avoidance; Invasive species; Male mate choice; Reproductive interference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In some species, males readily show courtship behaviour towards heterospecific females and even prefer them to females of their own species. This behaviour is generally explained by indiscriminate mating to acquire more mates, but may partly be explained by male mate preference mechanisms that have developed to choose among conspecific females, as male preference for larger females causes mating with larger heterospecific females. Recently, we found that males of the red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi collected from Spain (invasive population), prefer to mate with females of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae rather than with conspecific females. In spider mites, mate preference for non-kin individuals has been observed. Here, we investigated if T. evansi males collected from the area of its origin (Brazil) also show preference for heterospecific females. Secondly, we investigated if mate preference of T. evansi males for heterospecific females is affected by their relatedness to conspecific females which are offered together with heterospecific females. We found that mate preference for heterospecific females exists in Brazilian T. evansi, suggesting that the preference for heterospecific females is not a lack of evolved premating isolation with an allopatric species. We found that T. evansi males showed lower propensity to mate with heterospecific females when alternative females were non-kin in the two iso-female lines collected from Brazil. However, the effect of relatedness on male mate preference was not significant. We discuss alternative hypotheses explaining why T. evansi males prefer to mate with T. urticae females.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 31
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MATE CHOICE IN AVIAN POLYGYNY - WHY DO FEMALES PREFER OLDER MALES
    WEATHERHEAD, PJ
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 123 (06): : 873 - 875
  • [22] Why do males with ESRD have higher mortality rates than females?
    Bloembergen, WE
    Carroll, C
    Gillespie, B
    Young, EW
    Wolfe, RA
    Port, FK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (09): : A0961 - A0961
  • [23] WHY DO PIED FLYCATCHER FEMALES MATE WITH ALREADY-MATED MALES
    ALATALO, RV
    LUNDBERG, A
    STAHLBRANDT, K
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 30 (MAY) : 585 - 593
  • [24] Why do males and females of Python']Python regius differ in ectoparasite load?
    Luiselli, Luca
    [J]. AMPHIBIA-REPTILIA, 2006, 27 (03) : 469 - 471
  • [25] Why do they choose their instruments?
    Martinez Cantero, Irene
    Jauset-Berrocal, Jordi-Angel
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MUSIC EDUCATION, 2017, 34 (02) : 203 - 215
  • [26] Why males and females look different
    Shuster, Stephen M.
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (12) : 3644 - 3645
  • [27] Common Wall Lizard Females (Podarcis muralis) do not Actively Choose Males Based on their Colour Morph
    Sacchi, Roberto
    Ghitti, Michele
    Scali, Stefano
    Mangiacotti, Marco
    Zuffi, Marco A. L.
    Sannolo, Marco
    Coladonato, Alan J.
    Pasquesi, Giulia
    Bovo, Matteo
    Pellitteri-Rosa, Daniele
    [J]. ETHOLOGY, 2015, 121 (12) : 1145 - 1153
  • [28] Females reward courtship by competing males in a cannibalistic spider
    Stoltz, J. A.
    Elias, D. O.
    Andrade, M. C. B.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2008, 62 (05) : 689 - 697
  • [29] How do Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) females penetrate densely webbed spider mite nests?
    M. Montserrat
    F. de la Peña
    J. I. Hormaza
    J. J. González-Fernández
    [J]. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2008, 44 : 101 - 106
  • [30] Females reward courtship by competing males in a cannibalistic spider
    J. A. Stoltz
    D. O. Elias
    M. C. B. Andrade
    [J]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2008, 62 : 689 - 697