Centrality-Based Group Profiling: A Comparative Study in Co-authorship Networks

被引:0
|
作者
João E. A. Gomes
Ricardo B. C. Prudêncio
André C. A. Nascimento
机构
[1] Campus Serra Talhada,Centro de Informática
[2] Instituto Federal do Sertão Pernambucano (IFSertão-PE),Dep. de Estatística e Informática
[3] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE),undefined
[4] Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE),undefined
来源
New Generation Computing | 2018年 / 36卷
关键词
Social network analysis; Communities; Group profiling; Relational information; Centrality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Group profiling methods aim to construct a descriptive profile for communities in social networks. This task is similar to the traditional cluster labeling task, commonly adopted in document clustering to identify tags which characterize each derived cluster. This similarity encourages the direct application of cluster labeling methods for group profiling problems. However, in group profiling, an important additional information can be leveraged, which is the presence of links among the clustered individuals. This work extends our previous work by incorporating relational information to better describe communities. The proposed approach, so-called Centrality-based Group Profiling approach, makes use of network centrality measures in the selection of nodes for the characterization, i.e., nodes that generalize the content of the observed communities. The use of relational information to select relevant nodes in a community significantly reduces the complexity of the profiling task, at the same time retaining enough representative content to produce a good characterization. Experiments were conducted in a co-authorship network to evaluate different profiling strategies. The results demonstrated the ability of the proposed approach to producing good profiles for the observed groups with both group profiling and standard cluster labeling methods, with a considerably lower computational cost.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 89
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Significance and Evolution of Co-authorship Networks
    Kudelka, Milos
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL AFRO-EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR INDUSTRIAL ADVANCEMENT (AECIA 2015), 2016, 427 : 3 - 4
  • [22] A Hybrid Recommendation System in Co-authorship Networks
    Aslan, Serpil
    Kaya, Mehmet
    [J]. 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP 2019), 2019,
  • [23] Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks
    Singh, Chakresh Kumar
    Vasques Filho, Demival
    Jolad, Shivakumar
    O'Neale, Dion R. J.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 125 (01) : 385 - 404
  • [24] Centrality-Based Opinion Modeling on Temporal Networks
    Eeti
    Singh, Anurag, Sr.
    Cherifi, Hocine
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 1945 - 1961
  • [25] Co-authorship Networks in Swiss Political Research
    Leifeld, Philip
    Ingold, Karin
    [J]. SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 22 (02) : 264 - 287
  • [26] Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research
    Fischbach, Kai
    Putzke, Johannes
    Schoder, Detlef
    [J]. ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2011, 21 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [27] Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks
    Chakresh Kumar Singh
    Demival Vasques Filho
    Shivakumar Jolad
    Dion R. J. O’Neale
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125 : 385 - 404
  • [28] Visualizing Co-authorship networks in online wikipedia
    Biuk-Aghai, Robert P.
    [J]. 2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES,VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 787 - 792
  • [29] Research topic flows in co-authorship networks
    Schaefermeier, Bastian
    Hirth, Johannes
    Hanika, Tom
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (09) : 5051 - 5078
  • [30] Tourism Research Co-authorship Networks in China
    Zhang, Jiekuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA TOURISM RESEARCH, 2015, 11 (04) : 424 - 439