Fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS for technical requirements ranking in HOQ

被引:0
|
作者
Seyyed Mahdi Hosseini Motlagh
Majid Behzadian
Joshua Ignatius
Mark Goh
Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
Tan Kim Hua
机构
[1] Iran University of Science and Technology,School of Industrial Engineering
[2] Shomal University,School of Industrial Engineering
[3] Universiti Sains Malaysia,School of Mathematical Sciences
[4] National University of Singapore,Decision Sciences Department, School of Business
[5] RMIT University,School of Business IT and Logistics
[6] Tarbiat Modares University,Department of Industrial Engineering
[7] University of Nottingham,Nottingham Business School,
关键词
Fuzzy; GDSS; PROMETHEE; Quality function deployment; House of quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) in a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) approach to ranking the technical requirements for the house of quality (HOQ) process in multi-criteria product design. The problem under study involves incorporating the design alternatives of a group of designers located in different geographies who often provide vague and imprecise linguistic design information to the HOQ process. As such, the proposed fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS allows the quality function deployment (QFD) team of designers to minimize any deviation arising from the individual designer preferences and to capture the ambiguity of the imprecise design information when expressing the importance of customer needs and to delineate the linkage between customer needs and the technical requirements. The approach advances the HOQ group decision-making context in two important aspects. First, it treats each criterion and decision maker (DM) as unique in terms of the preference function and threshold levels. Second, it facilitates a rapid communication among DMs for the HOQ process. A case of a design team for an ergonomic chair manufacturer serves to validate this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1993 / 2002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing
    Chen, Ying-Hsiu
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Wu, Chao-Yen
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) : 13216 - 13222
  • [42] A novel IVIF QFD considering both the correlations of customer requirements and the ranking uncertainty of technical attributes
    Wang, Linyu
    Yu, Liying
    Ni, Zhongxin
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (09) : 4199 - 4213
  • [43] A novel IVIF QFD considering both the correlations of customer requirements and the ranking uncertainty of technical attributes
    Linyu Wang
    Liying Yu
    Zhongxin Ni
    Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 4199 - 4213
  • [44] Identification and ranking biomaterials for bone scaffolds using machine learning and PROMETHEE
    Javaid S.
    Gorji H.T.
    Soulami K.B.
    Kaabouch N.
    Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 39 (01) : 129 - 138
  • [45] Evaluate Air Pollution by Promethee Ranking in Yangtze River Delta of China
    Yu, Xiaobing
    Li, Chenliang
    Chen, Hong
    Ji, Zhonghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (02)
  • [46] APPLICATION OF PROMETHEE METHOD FOR DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT (DSM) OPTIONS RANKING
    Mokhtar, Muhamad Rasydan
    Abdullah, Md Pauzi
    Hassan, Mohammad Yusri
    Hussin, Faridah
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2016, 78 (5-7): : 23 - 28
  • [47] ANN-based Fuzzy Reasoning to Determine the Importance of Technical Requirements in QFD
    Yang, Mingshun
    Li, Yan
    Li, Shujjuan
    Li, Pengyang
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 8046 - 8050
  • [48] A fuzzy ranking method for fuzzy numbers
    Lee, JH
    You, KH
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, E86A (10) : 2650 - 2658
  • [49] Fuzzy ranking and quadratic fuzzy regression
    Chen, YS
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1999, 38 (11-12) : 265 - 279
  • [50] Ranking of fuzzy numbers by fuzzy mapping
    Asady, B.
    Akbari, M.
    Keramati, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 2011, 88 (08) : 1603 - 1618