Impact of Phenolic Compounds and Related Enzymes in Sorghum Varieties for Resistance and Susceptibility to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

被引:0
|
作者
Mamoudou H. Dicko
Harry Gruppen
Clarisse Barro
Alfred S. Traore
Willem J. H. van Berkel
Alphons G. J. Voragen
机构
[1] Université de Ouagadougou,Laboratoire de Biochimie, UFR
[2] Wageningen University,SVT, CRSBAN
[3] Wageningen University,Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences
[4] INERA/SARIA,Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences
来源
关键词
Sorghum; proanthocyanidins; 3-deoxyanthocyanidins; phenylalanine ammonia lyase; peroxidase; polyphenol oxidase; stress; biotic; abiotic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Contents of phenolic compounds and related enzymes before and after sorghum grain germination were compared between varieties either resistant or susceptible to biotic (sooty stripe, sorghum midge, leaf anthracnose, striga, and grain molds) and abiotic (lodging, drought resistance, and photoperiod sensitivity) stresses. Independent of grain germination, sorghum varieties resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses had on average higher contents of proanthocyanidins (PAs), 3-deoxyanthocyanidins (3-DAs), and flavan-4-ols than susceptible varieties. Results show that content of 3-DAs is a good marker for sorghum resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses because it correlates with resistance to all stresses except for photoperiod sensitivity. The second good marker for stress resistance is content of PAs. Total phenolic compounds and the activities of related enzymes are not good markers for stress resistance in sorghum grains.
引用
收藏
页码:2671 / 2688
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Biosyntheses of characteristic aroma compounds in tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves and their formations in response to biotic and abiotic stresses
    Yang, Ziyin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [33] Impact of sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) phenolic compounds on cancer development pathways
    Collins, Aduba
    Santhakumar, Abishek Bommannan
    Francis, Nidhish
    Blanchard, Christopher
    Chinkwo, Kenneth
    FOOD BIOSCIENCE, 2024, 59
  • [34] Technological Effectiveness of Chelated Micronutrient Fertilizers in Leaf Treatments Inducing Grapes Resistance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
    Yurchenko, Eugeniya
    Artamonov, Alexander
    XI INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE BIOLOGICAL PLANT PROTECTION IS THE BASIS OF AGROECOSYSTEMS STABILIZATION, 2020, 21
  • [35] Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses:: From classical breeding to marker assisted selection
    Patto, MCV
    Skiba, B
    Pang, ECK
    Ochatt, SJ
    Lambein, F
    Rubiales, D
    EUPHYTICA, 2006, 147 (1-2) : 133 - 147
  • [36] Introgressions of Vitis rotundifolia Michx. to obtain grapevine genotypes with complex resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses
    Volynkin, V. A.
    Likhovskoi, V. V.
    Vasylyk, I. A.
    Rybachenko, N. A.
    Lushchay, E. A.
    Gorislavets, S. M.
    Volodin, V. A.
    Risovannaya, V., I
    Potokina, E. K.
    VAVILOVSKII ZHURNAL GENETIKI I SELEKTSII, 2021, 25 (07): : 693 - 700
  • [37] Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical breeding to marker assisted selection
    M. C. Vaz Patto
    B. Skiba
    E. C. K. Pang
    S. J. Ochatt
    F. Lambein
    D. Rubiales
    Euphytica, 2006, 147 : 133 - 147
  • [38] Association analysis of biotic and abiotic stresses resistance in chickpea (Cicer spp.) using AFLP markers
    Saeed, Ali
    Darvishzadeh, Reza
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2017, 31 (04) : 698 - 708
  • [39] Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables
    Tomás-Barberán, F
    Espín, JC
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2001, 81 (09) : 853 - 876
  • [40] Role of Pathogen-Related Protein 10 (PR 10) under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Plants
    Sinha, Rakesh Kumar
    Verma, Shiv Shankar
    Rastogi, Anshu
    PHYTON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2020, 89 (02) : 167 - 182