Comparative evaluation of GIS-based models for mapping aquifer vulnerability in hard-rock terrains

被引:0
|
作者
M. Annie Jenifer
Madan K. Jha
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,School of Water Resources
[2] Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,AgFE Department
来源
关键词
Groundwater vulnerability; Model evaluation; DRASTIC model; Modified DRASTIC models; Validation; Sensitivity analyses;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aquifer vulnerability assessment plays a vital role in identifying the areas/regions which are highly susceptible to groundwater contamination. The main intent of this study is to modify original DRASTIC and DRASTIC-P models by adding two exogenous factors [‘land use/land cover’ (LU) and ‘lineament density’ (LD)] which significantly influence groundwater contamination. The performances of original DRASTIC and DRASTIC-P (agricultural DRASTIC) models were compared with those of six modified forms of these models, viz., ‘DRASTIC-LD’, ‘DRASTIC-LU’, ‘DRASTIC-LDLU’, ‘DRASTIC-P-LD’, ‘DRASTIC-P-LU’ and ‘DRASTIC-P-LDLU’. The results of these models were validated with two scientifically sound and pragmatic approaches: (i) using the single water-quality parameter as a source of groundwater contamination (Approach I), and (ii) using multi-water quality parameters causing groundwater contamination (Approach II). Moreover, the sensitivity of these models was analyzed to identify most influential parameters in each case. The results revealed that irrespective of the models employed more than 50% of the study area falls under ‘High’ and ‘Very High’ vulnerability zones. The Approach I validation results indicated that the ‘DRASTIC-P-LDLU’ model performs the best with an accuracy of 61% and 68% with respect to nitrate and chloride concentrations, respectively, followed by the DRASTIC-LDLU model (respective accuracy = 59% and 61%). The results of model validation using Approach II also confirmed that among the eight models, the ‘Specific’ aquifer vulnerability predicted by the ‘DRASTIC-P-LDLU’ model (accuracy = 30%)  is reasonably more accurate than DRASTIC-LDLU (accuracy = 29.7%) and DRASTIC-P-LU (accuracy = 29.6%) models. Hence, it is recommended to assess ‘Specific’ aquifer vulnerability instead of ‘Intrinsic’ aquifer vulnerability. The results of the model sensitivity analyses also indicated that ‘lineament density’ and ‘land use/land cover’ are the most significant parameters for vulnerability assessment.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GIS-based evaluation of shallow aquifer vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC model: a case study on Abakaliki, southeastern, Nigeria
    Stanley Ikenna Ifediegwu
    Iyi Emmanuel Chibuike
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (23)
  • [42] GIS-based COVID-19 vulnerability mapping in the West Bank, Palestine
    Shadeed, Sameer
    Alawna, Sandy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 64
  • [43] GIS-Based and Contributing Weight Approach for Vulnerability Mapping of Regional Landslide Hazard
    Shi Lili
    Qiao Jianping
    Wang Meng
    [J]. EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 4196 - 4200
  • [44] Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model
    Pathak, Dhundi Raj
    Hiratsuka, Akira
    Awata, Isao
    Chen, Luonan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 57 (07): : 1569 - 1578
  • [45] Vulnerability Identification of Hajiabad Plain Aquifer: The DRASTIC Model and the GIS-Based Fuzzy Logic Method
    Hassanzadeh, Mehrdad
    Reghabadi, Mehdi Momeni
    Robati, Amir
    [J]. AIR SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 14
  • [46] DRASTIC Index GIS-Based Vulnerability Map for the Entre-os-Rios Thermal Aquifer
    Goncalves, Vanessa
    Albuquerque, Antonio
    Almeida, Pedro G.
    Cavaleiro, Victor
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [47] GIS-based assessment of aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC Model: A case study on Kodaganar basin
    Colins, Johnny
    Sashikkumar, M. C.
    Anas, P. A.
    Kirubakaran, M.
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (01) : H1 - H8
  • [48] A methodology for the mathematical modelling of hard-rock aquifers at catchment scale, based on the geological structure and the hydrogeological functioning of the aquifer
    Lachassagne, P
    Golaz, C
    Thiery, D
    Ahmed, S
    Maréchal, JC
    Touchard, F
    Wyns, R
    [J]. NEW APPROACHES CHARACTERIZING GROUNDWATER FLOW, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 367 - 370
  • [49] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Different GIS-Based Bivariate Models
    Nohani, Ebrahim
    Moharrami, Meisam
    Sharafi, Samira
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Binh Thai Pham
    Lee, Saro
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [50] GIS-based ensemble soft computing models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Pham, Binh Thai
    Phong, Tran Van
    Nguyen-Thoi, Trung
    Trinh, Phan Trong
    Tran, Quoc Cuong
    Ho, Lanh Si
    Singh, Sushant K.
    Duyen, Tran Thi Thanh
    Nguyen, Loan Thi
    Le, Huy Quang
    Le, Hiep Van
    Hanh, Nguyen Thi Bich
    Quoc, Nguyen Kim
    Prakash, Indra
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2020, 66 (06) : 1303 - 1320