A robust and informative method for solving large-scale power flow problems

被引:0
|
作者
Walter Murray
Tomás Tinoco De Rubira
Adam Wigington
机构
[1] Stanford University,Computational and Mathematical Engineering
[2] Stanford University,Electrical Engineering
[3] Electric Power Research Institute,undefined
关键词
Power flow; Load flow; Augmented Lagrangian; Newton–Raphson; Robust; Complementarity constraints;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Solving power flow problems is essential for the reliable and efficient operation of an electric power network. However, current software for solving these problems have questionable robustness due to the limitations of the solution methods used. These methods are typically based on the Newton–Raphson method combined with switching heuristics for handling generator reactive power limits and voltage regulation. Among the limitations are the requirement of a good initial solution estimate, the inability to handle near rank-deficient Jacobian matrices, and the convergence issues that may arise due to conflicts between the switching heuristics and the Newton–Raphson process. These limitations are addressed by reformulating the power flow problem and using robust optimization techniques. In particular, the problem is formulated as a constrained optimization problem in which the objective function incorporates prior knowledge about power flow solutions, and solved using an augmented Lagrangian algorithm. The prior information included in the objective adds convexity to the problem, guiding iterates towards physically meaningful solutions, and helps the algorithm handle near rank-deficient Jacobian matrices as well as poor initial solution estimates. To eliminate the negative effects of using switching heuristics, generator reactive power limits and voltage regulation are modeled with complementarity constraints, and these are handled using smooth approximations of the Fischer–Burmeister function. Furthermore, when no solution exists, the new method is able to provide sensitivity information that aids an operator on how best to alter the system. The proposed method has been extensively tested on real power flow networks of up to 58k buses.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 475
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On solving large-scale weighted least squares problems
    Baryamureeba, V
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2001, 1988 : 59 - 67
  • [32] Solving very large-scale structural optimization problems
    Hüttner, F.
    Grosspietsch, M.
    1600, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191-4344, United States (45):
  • [33] Solving large-scale fuzzy and possibilistic optimization problems
    Lodwick, WA
    Jamison, KD
    Bachman, KA
    NAFIPS 2004: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY, VOLS 1AND 2: FUZZY SETS IN THE HEART OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES, 2004, : 146 - 150
  • [34] Solving large-scale fuzzy and possibilistic optimization problems
    Lodwick W.A.
    Bachman K.A.
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2005, 4 (4) : 257 - 278
  • [35] Solving large-scale eigenvalue problems in SciDAC applications
    Yang, C
    SciDAC 2005: Scientific Discovery Through Advanced Computing, 2005, 16 : 425 - 434
  • [36] Efficiently solving very large-scale routing problems
    Arnold, Florian
    Gendreau, Michel
    Sorensen, Kenneth
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 107 : 32 - 42
  • [37] CuLDA: Solving Large-scale LDA Problems on GPUs
    Xie, Xiaolong
    Liang, Yun
    Li, Xiuhong
    Tan, Wei
    HPDC'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2019, : 195 - 205
  • [38] Solving Large-scale Stochastic Orienteering Problems with Aggregation
    Thayer, Thomas C.
    Carpin, Stefano
    2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, : 2452 - 2458
  • [39] Solving very large-scale structural optimization problems
    Huettner, F.
    Grosspietsch, M.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (11) : 2729 - 2736