Neo-adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers

被引:0
|
作者
Shani Paluch-Shimon
Eitan Friedman
Raanan Berger
Moshe Papa
Maya Dadiani
Neil Friedman
Moshe Shabtai
Dov Zippel
Mordechai Gutman
Talia Golan
Ady Yosepovich
Raphael Catane
Tami Modiano
Bella Kaufman
机构
[1] The Chaim Sheba Medical Center,Institute of Oncology
[2] The Chaim Sheba Medical Center,The Dr. Pinchas Borenstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program
[3] The Chaim Sheba Medical Center,The Suzanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit
[4] The Chaim Sheba Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[5] The Chaim Sheba Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[6] Tel Aviv University,The Sackler School of Medicine
来源
关键词
Neo-adjuvant; Triple negative; BRCA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess pathological complete response and whether it serves a surrogate for survival among patients receiving neo-adjuvant doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer with respect to BRCA1 mutation status. From a neo-adjuvant systemic therapy database of 588 breast cancer cases, 80 triple-negative cases who had undergone BRCA genotyping were identified. Logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association between BRCA1 status and pathological complete response. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method, differences between study groups calculated by log-rank test. Thirty-four BRCA1 carriers and 43 non-carriers were identified. The BRCA1 carriers had pathological complete response rate of 68 % compared with 37 % among non-carriers, p = 0.01. Yet this did not translate into superior survival for BRCA1 carriers compared with non-carriers. No difference in relapse-free survival were noted among those with or without pathological complete response in BRCA1 carriers regardless of pathological complete response status (Log-rank p = 0.25), whereas in the non-carrier cohort, relapse-free survival was superior for those achieving pathological complete response (Log-rank p < 0.0001). Response to neo-adjuvant systemic therapy differed in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer compared with triple-negative non-carriers, with a higher rate of pathological complete response. However, compared with non-carrier triple-negative breast cancer, pathological complete response was not a surrogate for superior relapse-free survival in BRCA1 patients. Future studies using specific chemotherapy regimens may provide further improvements in outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Metcalfe, K
    Lynch, HT
    Chadirian, P
    Tung, N
    Olivotto, V
    Warner, E
    Olopade, OI
    Eisen, A
    Weber, B
    McLennan, J
    Sun, P
    Foulkes, WD
    Narod, SA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) : 2328 - 2335
  • [42] CAG and GGC repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene and breast cancer susceptibility in BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers
    Kadouri, L
    Easton, DF
    Edwards, S
    Hubert, A
    Kote-Jarai, Z
    Glaser, B
    Durocher, F
    Abeliovich, D
    Peretz, T
    Eeles, RA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [43] Prognosis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer
    Rennert, G
    Bisland-Becktell, S
    Almog, R
    Zhang, S
    Rennert, HS
    Narod, S
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (02) : 221 - 221
  • [44] Screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers for Breast Cancer
    Warner, Ellen
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [45] Contralateral breast cancer and tumor recurrence in BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers at a high risk of hereditary breast cancer after bilateral mastectomy
    Allue Cabanuz, Marta
    Domingo Breton, Maria
    Choliz Ezquerro, Jorge
    Arribas del Amo, Maria Dolores
    Guemes Sanchez, Antonio Tomas
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2020, 98 (10): : 612 - 617
  • [46] Reproductive factors as risk modifiers of breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and high-risk non-carriers
    Park, Boyoung
    Hopper, John L.
    Win, Aung K.
    Dowty, James G.
    Sung, Ho Kyung
    Ahn, Choonghyun
    Kim, Sung-Won
    Lee, Min Hyuk
    Lee, Jihyoun
    Lee, Jong Won
    Kang, Eunyoung
    Yu, Jong-Han
    Kim, Ku Sang
    Moon, Byung-In
    Han, Wonshik
    Noh, Dong-Young
    Park, Sue K.
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (60) : 102110 - 102118
  • [47] Male breast cancer: A comparison between BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers in Hong Kong, Southern China
    Kwong, A.
    Chau, W. W.
    Wong, C. H. N.
    Law, F. B. F.
    Ng, E. K. O.
    Suen, D. T. K.
    Kurian, A. W.
    West, D. W.
    Ford, J. M.
    Ma, E. S. K.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [48] Comparison of mammographic appearances in BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers in a family with a 1294de140 mutation.
    Gregory, H
    Pearson, R
    McLeod, A
    Schofield, A
    Haites, N
    Gilbert, F
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1997, 34 : 236 - 236
  • [49] Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    E Levy-Lahad
    E Friedman
    British Journal of Cancer, 2007, 96 : 11 - 15
  • [50] Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Levy-Lahad, E.
    Friedman, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 96 (01) : 11 - 15