A Comparative Utility Score for Digital Health Tools

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua C. Burton
Samantha Regala
Deonte Williams
Aditi Desai
Han He
Oliver Aalami
Edward R. Mariano
Randall S. Stafford
Seshadri C. Mudumbai
机构
[1] Palo Alto University,Center for Innovation to Implementation
[2] Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System,Vascular Surgery Service
[3] Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System,Department of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery
[4] Stanford University School of Medicine,Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service
[5] Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
[6] Stanford University School of Medicine,Department of Medicine
[7] Stanford University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
关键词
Digital health; Telehealth; Technology; Acceptance; Utility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Digital health tools (DHT) are increasingly poised to change healthcare delivery given the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the drive to telehealth. Establishing the potential utility of a given DHT could aid in identifying how it could be best used and further opportunities for healthcare improvement. We propose a metric, a Utility Factor Score, which quantifies the benefits of a DHT by explicitly defining adherence and linking it directly to satisfaction and health goals met. To provide data for how the comparative utility score can or should work, we illustrate in detail the application of our metrics across four DHTs with two simulated users. The Utility Factor Score can potentially facilitate integration of DHTs into various healthcare settings and should be evaluated within a clinical study.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gongora and his first biographers: a comparative analysis using digital tools
    Guerry, Francois-Xavier
    [J]. E-SPANIA-REVUE ELECTRONIQUE D ETUDES HISPANIQUES MEDIEVALES, 2018, 29
  • [32] A Comparative Analysis of Digital Forensic Investigation Tools on Facebook Messenger Applications
    Sunardi
    Herman
    Ardiningtias, Syifa Riski
    [J]. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 2022, 11 (05): : 655 - 672
  • [33] Wear recording at micro deep drawing tools with comparative digital holography
    Huferath-von Luepke, S.
    Huke, P.
    von Kopylow, C.
    Bergmann, R. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN OPTICAL SOCIETY-RAPID PUBLICATIONS, 2012, 7
  • [34] Insights into the Use of Digital Tools for People with Mental Health Disorders
    Nash, David B.
    [J]. POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 : S53 - S54
  • [35] Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis
    Emily Eisner
    Natalie Berry
    Sandra Bucci
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 23
  • [36] Consumer Electronic Show 2018: A Focus on Digital Health Tools
    Skiba, Diane J.
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 39 (03) : 194 - 195
  • [37] Digital health tools in genomics: Advancing diversity, equity and inclusion
    Assamad, Daniel
    Majeed, Safa
    Aguda, Vernie
    Grewal, Sonya
    Butkowsky, Carly
    Clausen, Marc
    D'Amours, Guylaine
    Bombard, Yvonne
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 194 - 200
  • [38] Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis
    Eisner, Emily
    Berry, Natalie
    Bucci, Sandra
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [39] Investigating the use of digital health tools in physiotherapy: facilitators and barriers
    Keel, Sara
    Schmid, Anja
    Keller, Fabienne
    Schoeb, Veronika
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (07) : 1449 - 1468
  • [40] COMPARATIVE SENSITIVITY OF SHORT HEALTH-STATUS AND UTILITY MEASURES
    KATZ, JN
    PHILLIPS, CB
    LARSON, MG
    FOSSEL, AH
    LIANG, MH
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 39 (02): : A578 - A578