Benefits and Challenges of Electronic Health Record System on Stakeholders: A Qualitative Study of Outpatient Physicians

被引:0
|
作者
Weng Chi Chao
Hao Hu
Carolina Oi Lam Ung
Yong Cai
机构
[1] University of Macau,
来源
关键词
Electronic health record system; Stakeholder; Physician; Hospital; Patient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electronic health record system (EHRS) is an important healthcare innovation associated with many controversies about the benefits and challenges to different stakeholders. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of EHRS by outpatient physicians in Macao and to identify, in their opinions, the significance of EHRS on health institutes, patients, and physicians. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 physicians who worked in the outpatient department. The interview data showed that 78 % physicians interviewed used EHRS frequently during their daily practice despite individual preferences of documentation methods. They agreed that systemic health record offered by EHRS allowing smooth communication was beneficial to the health institutes, patients and physicians. However, privacy and confidentiality concerned both the health institutes and patients. Inefficiency of the EHRS that only allowed retrieval of limited medical information of the patients hindered physicians’ acceptability of EHRS. It was also suggested that the health institutes should take into consideration interests of different stakeholders when designing and implementing EHRS.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits and Challenges of Electronic Health Record System on Stakeholders: A Qualitative Study of Outpatient Physicians
    Chao, Weng Chi
    Hu, Hao
    Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
    Cai, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 (04)
  • [2] Professional Behavior and Value Erosion: A Qualitative Study of Physicians and the Electronic Health Record
    Skeff, Kelley M.
    Brown-Johnson, Cati G.
    Asch, Steven M.
    Zionts, Dani L.
    Winget, Marcy
    Kerem, Yaniv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 67 (05) : 339 - 352
  • [3] How physicians document outpatient visit notes in an electronic health record
    Pollard, Stephanie E.
    Neri, Pamela M.
    Wilcox, Allison R.
    Volk, Lynn A.
    Williams, Deborah H.
    Schiff, Gordon D.
    Ramelson, Harley Z.
    Bates, David W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2013, 82 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [4] A Qualitative Study of Physicians' Views on the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data for Secondary Analysis
    Goldstein, Neal D.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [5] Benefits and Challenges of Transitioning Occupational Health to an Enterprise Electronic Health Record
    Isakari, Marcia
    Sanchez, Arthur
    Conic, Rosalynn
    Peretti, Jacqueline
    Saito, Kenji
    Sitapati, Amy M.
    Millen, Marlene
    Longhurst, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 65 (07) : 615 - 620
  • [6] Developing an Outpatient Electronic Medical Record System in Taiwan From a Physicians' Perspective
    Tseng, Hsiao-Ting
    Chang, Pei-Ting
    Chang, Ray
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 420 - 427
  • [7] The electronic patient record in the Brazilian health system: is it a reality for the physicians?
    Patricio, Camila Mendes
    Maia, Marianna Menezes
    Machiavelli, Josiane Lemos
    Navaes, Magdala de Araujo
    [J]. SCIENTIA MEDICA, 2011, 21 (03) : 121 - 131
  • [8] Electronic Health Record Time Among Outpatient Physicians: Reflections on the Who, What, and Why
    Adler-Milstein, Julia
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 172 (03) : 212 - 213
  • [9] A qualitative study of the dark and bright sides of physicians' electronic health record work outside work hours
    Attipoe, Selasi
    Walker, Daniel M.
    Schweikhart, Sharon B.
    Hefner, Jennifer L.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 48 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [10] The Physicians' Electronic Health Record Coalition
    Basch, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2007, 3 (06) : 321 - 322