ERPs and morphological processing: the N400 and semantic composition

被引:0
|
作者
Donna Coch
Jennifer Bares
Allison Landers
机构
[1] Dartmouth College,Department of Education, Reading Brains Lab
[2] Dartmouth College,Department of Education
关键词
ERPs; N400; Morphological decomposition; Semantic composition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Both behavioral and electrophysiological evidence suggests that fluent readers decompose morphologically complex words into their constituent parts. Previous event-related potential (ERP) research has been equivocal with regard to whether the N400 component indexes morphological decomposition or the integration of the products of decomposition, a process called semantic composition. In a visual lexical decision task with college students, we recorded ERPs to a well-controlled set of words and nonwords made up of bound morphemes (discern, predict; disject, percern) or free morphemes (cobweb, earring; cobline, bobweb) and monomorphemic control words and nonwords (garlic, minnow; gartus, buzlic). For each of the three morphological types, participants were faster to respond to words than to nonwords. Furthermore, for each of the three morphological types, the amplitude of the N400 was more negative to nonwords than to matched words, an effect indicating that the N400 is more sensitive to the lexicality of the whole stimulus than to the meaningfulness of the constituent parts of the stimulus. The N400 lexicality effect was not significantly different across the three morphological types. To our knowledge, this is the first ERP study to directly compare the processing of printed sets of words composed of bound and free morphemes and monomorphemic control stimuli in order to explore the relative sensitivity of the N400 to morphological decomposition (i.e., the status of the parts) and semantic composition (i.e., the status of the whole). Our findings are consistent with an interpretation of the N400 as an index of a process of semantic composition.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 370
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] N400 involvement in the processing of action sequences
    Reid, Vincent M.
    Striano, Tricia
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 433 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [42] Semantic Processing in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of the N400 Differences
    Joyal, Marilyne
    Groleau, Charles
    Bouchard, Clara
    Wilson, Maximiliano A.
    Fecteau, Shirley
    [J]. BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (11) : 1 - 45
  • [43] How early is semantics? Electrophysiological correlates of semantic processing peaking earlier than the N400
    Dien, Joseph
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 44 : S16 - S16
  • [44] RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions
    Proverbio, Alice Mado
    Riva, Federica
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 459 (03) : 142 - 146
  • [45] N400 mirrors morphological and orthographic differences in priming
    Dominguez, A
    de Vega, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (01) : 48 - 48
  • [46] Foreword to the special issue "Before the N400: Early Latency Language ERPs"
    Dien, Joseph
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 80 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [47] Semantic processing of words, cognitive resources and N400: An event-related potentials study
    Monetta, L
    Tremblay, T
    Joanette, Y
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2003, 53 (02) : 327 - 330
  • [48] Semantic Processing of Sentences in Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence From the N400 Effect
    Pijnacker, Judith
    Davids, Nina
    van Weerdenburg, Marjolijn
    Verhoeven, Ludo
    Knoors, Harry
    van Alphen, Petra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 60 (03): : 627 - 639
  • [49] FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing
    Voss, Joel L.
    Federmeier, Kara D.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (04) : 532 - 546
  • [50] The effect of anticipated achievement feedback on students' semantic processing as indicated by the N400 cloze effect
    Janssen, Eva M.
    van der Ven, Sanne H. G.
    van Hoogmoed, Anne H.
    Leseman, Paul P. M.
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2017, 47 : 80 - 90