Multi-Fidelity Orbit Determination with Systematic Errors

被引:0
|
作者
Enrico M. Zucchelli
Emmanuel D. Delande
Brandon A. Jones
Moriba K. Jah
机构
[1] The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics
[2] Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES),Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences
[3] The University of Texas at Austin,undefined
关键词
Multi-fidelity methods; Outer probability measures; Systematic errors; Initial orbit determination;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-fidelity approaches to orbit-state probability density prediction reduce computation time, but introduce a systematic error in the single-point prediction of a spacecraft state. An estimate of the systematic error may be quantified using cross-validation. Credibilistic filters based on Outer Probability Measures (OPMs) enable a principled and unified representation of random and systematic errors in object tracking. The quantified error of the multi-fidelity approach defines an OPM-based transition kernel, which is used in a credibilistic filter to account for the systematic error in the orbit determination process. An approach based on automatic domain splitting is proposed to reduce the error beyond what is normally achievable with multi-fidelity methods. A proof-of-concept for the approach is demonstrated for a simulated scenario tracking a newly-detected space object in low-Earth orbit via two ground stations generating radar measurements. An OPM-based definition of the admissible region combined with the multi-fidelity credibilistic filter establishes custody of the object.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 727
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Fidelity Orbit Determination with Systematic Errors
    Zucchelli, Enrico M.
    Delande, Emmanuel D.
    Jones, Brandon A.
    Jah, Moriba K.
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (03): : 695 - 727
  • [2] Multi-fidelity orbit uncertainty propagation
    Jones, Brandon A.
    Weisman, Ryan
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2019, 155 : 406 - 417
  • [3] Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates
    Chanyoung Park
    Raphael T. Haftka
    Nam H. Kim
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55 : 1029 - 1050
  • [4] Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates
    Park, Chanyoung
    Haftka, Raphael T.
    Kim, Nam H.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (03) : 1029 - 1050
  • [5] Multi-fidelity surrogate algorithm for fire origin determination in compartment fires
    Li, Nan
    Lee, Eric W. M.
    Cheung, Sherman C. P.
    Tu, Jiyuan
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2020, 36 (03) : 897 - 914
  • [6] Multi-fidelity surrogate algorithm for fire origin determination in compartment fires
    Nan Li
    Eric W. M. Lee
    Sherman C. P. Cheung
    Jiyuan Tu
    Engineering with Computers, 2020, 36 : 897 - 914
  • [7] The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Bandit
    Kandasamy, Kirthevasan
    Dasarathy, Gautam
    Schneider, Jeff
    Poczos, Barnabas
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [8] Multi-fidelity prototyping of user interfaces
    Coyette, Adrien
    Kieffer, Suzanne
    Vanderdonckt, Jean
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2007, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4662 : 150 - 164
  • [9] Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Fidelity Simulators
    Cutler, Mark
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    How, Jonathan P.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2014, : 3888 - 3895
  • [10] Multi-fidelity Hierarchical Neural Processes
    Wu, Dongxia
    Chinazzi, Matteo
    Vespignani, Alessandro
    Ma, Yi-An
    Yu, Rose
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2022, 2022, : 2029 - 2038