Multiple Interactive Pollutants in Water Quality Trading

被引:0
|
作者
Amin Sarang
Barbara J. Lence
Abolfazl Shamsai
机构
[1] Sharif University of Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] University of British Columbia,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Environmental Management | 2008年 / 42卷
关键词
Water quality trading; Multiple pollutants; Interactive; Transferable discharge permits; Weighting factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Efficient environmental management calls for the consideration of multiple pollutants, for which two main types of transferable discharge permit (TDP) program have been described: separate permits that manage each pollutant individually in separate markets, with each permit based on the quantity of the pollutant or its environmental effects, and weighted-sum permits that aggregate several pollutants as a single commodity to be traded in a single market. In this paper, we perform a mathematical analysis of TDP programs for multiple pollutants that jointly affect the environment (i.e., interactive pollutants) and demonstrate the practicality of this approach for cost-efficient maintenance of river water quality. For interactive pollutants, the relative weighting factors are functions of the water quality impacts, marginal damage function, and marginal treatment costs at optimality. We derive the optimal set of weighting factors required by this approach for important scenarios for multiple interactive pollutants and propose using an analytical elasticity of substitution function to estimate damage functions for these scenarios. We evaluate the applicability of this approach using a hypothetical example that considers two interactive pollutants. We compare the weighted-sum permit approach for interactive pollutants with individual permit systems and TDP programs for multiple additive pollutants. We conclude by discussing practical considerations and implementation issues that result from the application of weighted-sum permit programs.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 646
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimizing the scale of markets for water quality trading
    Doyle, Martin W.
    Patterson, Lauren A.
    Chen, Yanyou
    Schnier, Kurt E.
    Yates, Andrew J.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (09) : 7231 - 7244
  • [22] Water quality trading: Not ready for prime time?
    Anon
    Water Resources Research Institute News of the University of North Carolina, 2003, (340): : 6 - 8
  • [23] Nutrient trading advocated to improve water quality
    Christen, K
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (03) : 53A - 54A
  • [24] Regulating mine water releases using water quality trading
    Vink, Sue
    Hoey, David
    Robbins, Sarah
    Roux, Estelle
    RELIABLE MINE WATER TECHNOLOGY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL MINE WATER ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2013, VOLS I & II, 2013, : 71 - 76
  • [25] WATER QUALITY PLANNING IN PRESENCE INTERACTING POLLUTANTS
    DYSART, BC
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1970, 42 (08): : 1515 - &
  • [26] Agricultural impacts on water quality and implications for virtual water trading decisions
    Dabrowski, J. M.
    Murray, K.
    Ashton, P. J.
    Leaner, J. J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (04) : 1074 - 1082
  • [27] Checking the pulse of water-quality credit trading
    Jones, Cy
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (11) : 2175 - 2176
  • [28] Thin and lumpy: An experimental investigation of water quality trading
    Suter, Jordan F.
    Spraggon, John M.
    Poe, Gregory L.
    WATER RESOURCES AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 1 : 36 - 60
  • [29] Issues in Water Quality Trading: Introduction to Featured Collection
    Heberling, Matthew T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2011, 47 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [30] Addressing total phosphorus impairments with water quality trading
    Obropta, Christopher C.
    Rusciano, Gregory M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2006, 42 (05): : 1297 - 1306