Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Significant concerns?

被引：0

|

作者：

Todd A. Jackson

机构：

[1] Jackson is Director of Animal Resources,

[2] Oklahoma State University Center for Veterinary Health Sciences,undefined

[3] Stillwater,undefined

[4] OK.,undefined

来源：

Lab Animal | 2012年 / 41卷 / 4期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/laban0412-99

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：99 / 99

相关论文

共 50 条

[31] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Lighten Up!
Craig W. Stevens
[J]. Lab Animal, 2003, 32 (9) : 17 - 18
[32] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not very expedient
Brian W. Gibson
Lori Hill
[J]. Lab Animal, 2011, 40 (4) : 103 - 104
[33] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Agree to disagree
Marilyn Torchia
Tony Yaksh
[J]. Lab Animal, 2005, 34 (8) : 19 - 19
[34] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Inappropriate Actions
Maggie McTighe
Greg Hanley
[J]. Lab Animal, 2004, 33 : 17 - 17
[35] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Good neighbor or not?
Erin Hutteman
[J]. Lab Animal, 2011, 40 (5) : 142 - 143
[36] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Above the regulations
Felicia Ponce
Kevin R. Smith
C. Andrew Matchett
[J]. Lab Animal, 2013, 42 (3) : 82 - 82
[37] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: A valid concern
Jane J. Na
Howard G. Rush
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (7) : 258 - 258
[38] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Proceed, but cautiously
Jo Ann Henry
Gordon Roble
Jaclyn Steinbach
[J]. Lab Animal, 2014, 43 : 392 - 393
[39] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Focus on the issue
Michele Courtney
[J]. Lab Animal, 2006, 35 (3) : 16 - 16
[40] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Whose watch?
James Owiny
[J]. Lab Animal, 2009, 38 (3) : 79 - 80

← 1 2 3 4 5 →