Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Significant concerns?

被引：0

|

作者：

Todd A. Jackson

机构：

[1] Jackson is Director of Animal Resources,

[2] Oklahoma State University Center for Veterinary Health Sciences,undefined

[3] Stillwater,undefined

[4] OK.,undefined

来源：

Lab Animal | 2012年 / 41卷 / 4期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/laban0412-99

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：99 / 99

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Is the deviation significant?
Nardos Fessaha
[J]. Lab Animal, 2008, 37 (6) : 244 - 244
[2] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Addition is significant
Donna M. Zyry
Robert D. Gunnels
[J]. Lab Animal, 2009, 38 (8) : 256 - 256
[3] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Is the change significant?
Walter I. Horne
David C. Riccio
[J]. Lab Animal, 2013, 42 (2) : 50 - 50
[4] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not in the protocol, not approved
Austin Fritsch
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (8) : 296 - 296
[5] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Protocol is acceptable
Mary Ellen Goldberg
[J]. Lab Animal, 2015, 44 (6) : 204 - 205
[6] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not so simple a scenario
Ellen J. Croxford
[J]. Lab Animal, 2018, 47 (1) : 9 - 10
[7] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Gotcha!
Rhett W. Stout
[J]. Lab Animal, 2017, 46 (1) : 10 - 10
[8] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Not in this case
Rebecca Benz
Matthew L. Dunaif
[J]. Lab Animal, 2005, 34 (7) : 17 - 18
[9] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No accountability
Kirsten Love
[J]. Lab Animal, 2007, 36 (3) : 15 - 15
[10] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No delay
Amy J. Warshaw Funk
Jan T. Orick
[J]. Lab Animal, 2012, 41 (8) : 219 - 219

← 1 2 3 4 5 →