Do board interlocks motivate voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan

被引:19
|
作者
Chan A.L.-C. [1 ]
Lee E. [2 ]
Petaibanlue J. [3 ]
Tan N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Accounting, National Chengchi University, 64, Section 2, ZhiNan Road, Wenshan District, Taipei
[2] Accounting and Finance Division, Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth St. East, Manchester
[3] Department of Accountancy, Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok
[4] Deloitte & Touche, Taipei
关键词
Board independence; Board interlocks; Conference calls; R&D; Voluntary disclosure;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-016-0557-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conference calls have become a widely used medium for voluntary corporate disclosure, especially among firms associated with greater information asymmetry, intangible assets, and external competition. These features are common in high-tech sectors, which dominate the Taiwanese economy and render it a useful research setting for investigating whether board interlock, as a social network, affects corporate decisions to hold conference calls. We show that firms connected to conference-call-making firms through interlocked directors are more likely to hold conference calls and the frequency of holding conference calls increases with interlocking directors’ relevant experience. Moreover, such evidence is more pronounced if the connections are held through independent directors and among firms with greater information asymmetry. These results support the argument that the spread of corporate practices is positively associated with board interlock networks. Our findings have implications for the choice of board of director members, and can be generalized to other emerging economies characterized by weaker corporate information environments. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 466
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Board Interlocks and Stock Liquidity: New Evidence from an Emerging Market
    Mbanyele, William
    Wang, Fengrong
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (05) : 1415 - 1429
  • [22] Do Board Characteristics Impact Green Banking Disclosure? Empirical Evidence from Indonesia
    Farida, Dessy Noor
    Purwanto, Agus
    [J]. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 5 (02) : 187 - 197
  • [23] Do countries matter for voluntary disclosure? Evidence from cross-listed firms in the US
    Yaqi Shi
    Michel Magnan
    Jeong-Bon Kim
    [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43 : 143 - 165
  • [24] Do countries matter for voluntary disclosure? Evidence from cross-listed firms in the US
    Shi, Yaqi
    Magnan, Michel
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2012, 43 (02) : 143 - 165
  • [25] Board Structure, Ownership, and Voluntary Disclosure in Ireland
    Donnelly, Ray
    Mulcahy, Mark
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2008, 16 (05) : 416 - 429
  • [26] Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure
    Cheng, Eugene C. M.
    Courtenay, Stephen M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2006, 41 (03): : 262 - 289
  • [27] Director interlocks and spillover effects of board monitoring: evidence from regulatory sanctions
    Zhong, Qinlin
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Yuan, Chun
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2017, 57 (05): : 1605 - 1633
  • [28] Voluntary disclosure and firm value: Evidence from Indonesia
    Mahmudah, Hadi
    Yustina, Andi Ina
    Dewi, Christine Novita
    Sutopo, Bambang
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [29] Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: evidence from India
    Saha, Rupjyoti
    Kabra, Kailash Chandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2022, 20 (01) : 127 - 160
  • [30] The influence of board committee structures on voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Australian evidence
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    Velayutham, Eswaran
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2018, 50 : 65 - 81