Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of phonological and orthographic similarity on L2 word recognition across modalities in bilinguals

被引:0
|
作者
Candice Frances
Eugenia Navarra-Barindelli
Clara D. Martin
机构
[1] BCBL,Department of Social Sciences and Law
[2] Basque Center On Brain,undefined
[3] Language and Cognition,undefined
[4] UPV/EHU,undefined
[5] Basque Foundation for Science,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Language perception studies on bilinguals often show that words that share form and meaning across languages (cognates) are easier to process than words that share only meaning. This facilitatory phenomenon is known as the cognate effect. Most previous studies have shown this effect visually, whereas the auditory modality as well as the interplay between type of similarity and modality remain largely unexplored. In this study, highly proficient late Spanish–English bilinguals carried out a lexical decision task in their second language, both visually and auditorily. Words had high or low phonological and orthographic similarity, fully crossed. We also included orthographically identical words (perfect cognates). Our results suggest that similarity in the same modality (i.e., orthographic similarity in the visual modality and phonological similarity in the auditory modality) leads to improved signal detection, whereas similarity across modalities hinders it. We provide support for the idea that perfect cognates are a special category within cognates. Results suggest a need for a conceptual and practical separation between types of similarity in cognate studies. The theoretical implication is that the representations of items are active in both modalities of the non-target language during language processing, which needs to be incorporated to our current processing models.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Extracting Phonological Patterns for L2 Word Learning: The Effect of Poor Phonological Awareness
    Chieh-Fang Hu
    [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2014, 43 : 569 - 585
  • [22] Time course analyses of orthographic and phonological priming effects during word recognition in a transparent orthography
    Zeguers, M. H. T.
    Snellings, P.
    Huizenga, H. M.
    van der Molen, M. W.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (10): : 1925 - 1943
  • [23] Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading
    Schiff, Rachel
    Calif, Sharon
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2007, 57 (02) : 271 - 298
  • [24] Auditory word recognition across the lifespan Links between linguistic and nonlinguistic inhibitory control in bilinguals and monolinguals
    Blumenfeld, Henrike K.
    Schroeder, Scott R.
    Bobb, Susan C.
    Freeman, Max R.
    Marian, Viorica
    [J]. LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2016, 6 (1-2) : 119 - 146
  • [25] Can Bilinguals See It Coming? Word Anticipation in L2 Sentence Reading
    Foucart, Alice
    Martin, Clara D.
    Moreno, Eva M.
    Costa, Albert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (05) : 1461 - 1469
  • [26] The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean
    Kwon, Youan
    Lee, Yoonhyoung
    Nam, Kichun
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 501 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [27] Similarity and difference in learning L2 word-form
    Hamada, Megumi
    Koda, Keiko
    [J]. SYSTEM, 2011, 39 (04) : 500 - 509
  • [28] Serial recall of poor readers in two presentation modalities: Combined effects of phonological similarity and word length
    Irausquin, RS
    deGelder, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) : 342 - 369
  • [29] Orthographic Activation in L2 Spoke n Word Recognition Depends on Proficiency : Evidence from Eye-Tracking
    Veivo, Outi
    Jarvikivi, Juhani
    Porretta, Vincent
    Hyona, Jukka
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [30] Spoken word recognition of L2 using probabilistic phonotactics in L1: evidence from Cantonese-English bilinguals
    Yip, Michael C. W.
    [J]. LANGUAGE SCIENCES, 2020, 80