Screening for frailty among older emergency department visitors: Validation of the new FRESH-screening instrument

被引:48
|
作者
Kajsa E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Katarina W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sten L. [1 ,3 ]
Synneve I.-D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Gothenburg, Vårdalinstitutet, The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Lund
[2] The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Gothenburg
[3] University of Gothenburg, Center of Aging and Health-AGECAP, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Gothenburg
[4] Gothenburg University, Institute Neuroscience and physiology, Gothenburg
关键词
Frailty; Sensitivity; Specificity;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-016-0087-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The identification of frail older persons in different health care settings is widely seen as an important step in improving the healthcare system. Screening at an emergency department (ED) should be handled in just a few minutes without the use of tests or measurements. The FRESH-screening was developed for this purpose. This study's aim was to evaluate the FRESH-screening and its construct validity; also assessed were the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for frailty screening. Methods: The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 161 elderly people who sought care at the emergency department at Mölndal Hospital were included. Inclusion criteria were ages ≥80 years or ages 65-79 with at least one chronic disease and dependence in at least one daily living activity. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to describe the accuracy of the FRESH-screening in identifying those with frailty, as assessed by eight frailty indicators. Sensitivity and specificity were both set at a minimum of 80 %, and a percentage sum ≥150 of the sensitivity and positive prediction was considered a measure of excellent value. Result: Both sensitivity and specificity were high (81 % and 80 %, respectively) when comparing the four questions of the FRESH-screening against the eight frailty indicators. The percentage sum of sensitivity and positive prediction was 173 (81 % + 92 %), thus exceeding the 150 cutoff. Conclusion: This study shows the FRESH-screening to be of excellent clinical value. Additionally, the clinical experience is that the instrument is simple and rapid to use, takes only a few minutes to administer, and requires minimal energy input by older persons. © 2016 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Mass screening of emergency department visitors for occult radionuclide contamination
    Huang, Ying Chieh
    Tu, Dom-Gene
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (03) : 171 - 176
  • [12] Depression Screening for Older Adults in the Emergency Department
    Levy, S. A.
    Rivera-Reyes, L.
    Kelly, S. S.
    Linton, E.
    Loo, G. T.
    Richardson, L.
    Soriano, R.
    Hwang, U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 : S97 - S98
  • [13] Screening older patients in the Emergency Department.
    McCusker, J
    Bellavance, F
    Cardin, S
    Trepanier, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (09) : P268 - P268
  • [14] Screening for Frailty in Older Emergency Patients and Association with Outcome
    Lewis, Siobhan
    Evans, Louis
    Rainer, Timothy
    Hewitt, Jonathan
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 2020, 5 (01)
  • [15] Comparison of bedside screening methods for frailty assessment in older adult trauma patients in the emergency department
    Shah, Sachita P.
    Penn, Kevin
    Kaplan, Stephen J.
    Vrablik, Michael
    Jablonowski, Karl
    Pham, Tam N.
    Reed, May J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [16] Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients
    Chisolm-Straker, Makini
    Singer, Elizabeth
    Strong, David
    Loo, George T.
    Rothman, Emily F.
    Clesca, Cindy
    d'Etienne, James
    Alanis, Naomi
    Richardson, Lynne D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2021, 2 (05)
  • [17] Nontargeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in an Appalachian Emergency Department Identifies a High Prevalence of Infection Among Adult Emergency Department Visitors
    Moore, J. D.
    Galbraith, J.
    Cox, A.
    Furr, K.
    Smith, N.
    Cleland, D.
    Woodworth, A.
    Howard, P.
    Dai, C.
    Humphries, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (04) : S7 - S7
  • [18] Assessing the Efficacy of the Modified SEGA Frailty (mSEGA) Screening Tool in Predicting 12-Month Morbidity and Mortality among Elderly Emergency Department Visitors
    Zulfiqar, Abrar-Ahmad
    Fresne, Mathieu
    Andres, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [19] SWALLOWING/COMMUNICATION SCREENING IN OLDER ADULTS ATTENDING THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE SCORES
    Boyle, Orla
    Kelly, Louise
    Ryan, Maeve
    Brady, Deirdre
    Wade, Ruth
    Whelan, Catriona
    Doherty, Orlaith
    Murphy, Maeve
    Mello, Sarah
    McElwaine, Paul
    Gray, James
    Kennelly, Sean
    Hayden, Derek
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48
  • [20] SCREENING FRAILTY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: THE UTILITY OF THE SHARE-FI IN PREDICTING OUTCOMES IN A COHORT OF OLDER PATIENTS
    Kilbane, Lorna
    Fallon, Aoife
    Briggs, Robert
    McElwaine, Paul
    Collins, Ronan
    Coughlan, Tara
    O'Neill, Desmond
    Ryan, Dan
    Kennelly, Sean
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46