Screening for frailty among older emergency department visitors: Validation of the new FRESH-screening instrument

被引:48
|
作者
Kajsa E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Katarina W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sten L. [1 ,3 ]
Synneve I.-D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Gothenburg, Vårdalinstitutet, The Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Lund
[2] The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Gothenburg
[3] University of Gothenburg, Center of Aging and Health-AGECAP, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Gothenburg
[4] Gothenburg University, Institute Neuroscience and physiology, Gothenburg
关键词
Frailty; Sensitivity; Specificity;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-016-0087-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The identification of frail older persons in different health care settings is widely seen as an important step in improving the healthcare system. Screening at an emergency department (ED) should be handled in just a few minutes without the use of tests or measurements. The FRESH-screening was developed for this purpose. This study's aim was to evaluate the FRESH-screening and its construct validity; also assessed were the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for frailty screening. Methods: The study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 161 elderly people who sought care at the emergency department at Mölndal Hospital were included. Inclusion criteria were ages ≥80 years or ages 65-79 with at least one chronic disease and dependence in at least one daily living activity. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to describe the accuracy of the FRESH-screening in identifying those with frailty, as assessed by eight frailty indicators. Sensitivity and specificity were both set at a minimum of 80 %, and a percentage sum ≥150 of the sensitivity and positive prediction was considered a measure of excellent value. Result: Both sensitivity and specificity were high (81 % and 80 %, respectively) when comparing the four questions of the FRESH-screening against the eight frailty indicators. The percentage sum of sensitivity and positive prediction was 173 (81 % + 92 %), thus exceeding the 150 cutoff. Conclusion: This study shows the FRESH-screening to be of excellent clinical value. Additionally, the clinical experience is that the instrument is simple and rapid to use, takes only a few minutes to administer, and requires minimal energy input by older persons. © 2016 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening for frailty in older emergency department patients: the utility of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Instrument
    Fallon, A.
    Kilbane, L.
    Briggs, R.
    Dyer, A.
    Nabeel, S.
    McElwaine, P.
    Collins, R.
    Coughlan, T.
    O'Neill, D.
    Ryan, D.
    Kennelly, S. P.
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 111 (03) : 151 - 154
  • [2] Frailty screening of Tunisian older adults: feasibility and usefulness in the Emergency Department
    Chakroun-Walha, Olfa
    Walha, Adel
    Bradai, Haifa
    Nasri, Abdennour
    Karray, Rim
    Jerbi, Mouna
    Trabelsi, Rahma
    Rekik, Noureddine
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (04) : 229 - 233
  • [3] Comparison of three frailty screening instruments for prediction of adverse outcomes among older adults in the emergency department
    Shang, Na
    Liu, Huizhen
    Wang, Na
    Guo, Shubin
    Ma, Lina
    [J]. GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 22 (10) : 851 - 856
  • [4] Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Scale for Assessment and Screening of Frailty Among Older Indians
    De, Karishma
    Banerjee, Joyita
    Rajan, Sreerag P.
    Chatterjee, Prasun
    Chakrawarty, Avinash
    Khan, Maroof A.
    Singh, Vishwajeet
    Dey, Aparajit B.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2021, 16 : 537 - 547
  • [5] Comparison of Frailty Screening Instruments in the Emergency Department
    O'Caoimh, Ronan
    Costello, Maria
    Small, Cliona
    Spooner, Lynn
    Flannery, Antoinette
    O'Reilly, Liam
    Heffernan, Laura
    Mannion, Edel
    Maughan, Anna
    Joyce, Alma
    Molloy, D. William
    O'Donnell, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (19)
  • [6] SCREENING FOR FRAILTY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: COMPARISON OF TOOLS
    Macdonald, Steve
    Gray, Simone
    Kenny, Laura
    Ni She, Eidin
    Cooney, Marie Therese
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48
  • [7] Facilitating Colon-Rectal Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients and Visitors
    Trowbridge, R.
    King, R.
    Byun, R.
    Dabakis, M.
    Talati, A.
    Turocy, J.
    Illuzzi, F.
    Bradley, K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S104 - S105
  • [8] The Prognostic Accuracy of Clinical Judgment Versus a Validated Frailty Screening Instrument in Older Patients at the Emergency Department: Findings of the AmsterGEM Study
    van Dam, Carmen S.
    Trappenburg, Marijke C.
    Ter Wee, Marieke M.
    Hoogendijk, Emiel O.
    de Vet, Riekie
    Smulders, Yvo M.
    Nanayakkara, Prabath B.
    Muller, Majon
    Peters, Mike L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (05) : 422 - 431
  • [9] Frailty screening in the Emergency Department: why does it matter?
    van Oppen, James David
    Suzanne, Mason
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (04)
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF FRAILTY SCREENING TOOLS WITHIN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Loughlin, K. M.
    Lyons, C.
    McGettigan, L.
    Maloney, P.
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50