Use of Ecological Regions in Aquatic Assessments of Ecological Condition

被引:0
|
作者
John L. Stoddard
机构
[1] US Environmental Protection Agency,Western Ecology Division
来源
Environmental Management | 2004年 / 34卷
关键词
Ecoregions; Ecological condition; Reference condition; Bioassessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ecological regions are areas of similar climate, landform, soil, potential natural vegetation, hydrology, or other ecologically relevant variables. The makeup of aquatic biological assemblages (e.g., fish, macroinvertebrates, algae, riparian birds, etc.) varies dramatically over the landscape, as do the environmental stresses that affect the condition of those assemblages. Ecoregions delineate areas where similar assemblages are likely to occur and, therefore, where similar expectations can be established. For this reason, ecological regions have proven to be an important tool for use in the process of ecological assessment. This article describes four examples of the use of ecological regions in important aspects of environmental monitoring and assessment: (1) design of monitoring networks; (2) estimating expected conditions (criteria development); (3) reporting of results; (4) setting priorities for future monitoring and restoration. By delineating geographic areas with similar characteristics, ecological regions provide a framework for developing relevant indicators, setting expectations through the use of regional reference sites, establishing ecoregion-specific criteria and/or standards, presenting results, focusing models based on relationships between landscape and surface water metrics, and setting regional priorities for management and restoration. The Environmental Protection Agency and many state environmental departments currently use ecoregions to aid the development of environmental criteria, to illustrate current environmental condition, and to guide efforts to maintain and restore physical, chemical and biological integrity in lakes, streams, and rivers.
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S70
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study of aquatic ecological regions using fish fauna and geographic archipelago factors
    Itsukushima, Rei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 96 : 69 - 80
  • [22] A COLLOQUIUM ON ECOLOGICAL REGIONS
    EGLER, FE
    GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 1956, 46 (03) : 425 - 427
  • [23] AQUATIC FOAMS AS AN ECOLOGICAL HABITAT
    MAYNARD, NG
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ALLGEMEINE MIKROBIOLOGIE, 1968, 8 (02): : 119 - &
  • [24] Ecological integrity of aquatic systems
    Cairns, J
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (3-4): : 313 - 323
  • [25] Regulatory perspectives on the significance of ecological changes as reported in ecological risk assessments
    Henning, M
    Shear, N
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1998, 4 (04): : 807 - 814
  • [26] Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Will Improve Ecological Risk Assessments
    Hart, Barry T.
    Pollino, Carmel A.
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2008, 14 (05): : 851 - 853
  • [27] Comparability of fish-based ecological quality assessments for geographically distinct Iberian regions
    Segurado, P.
    Caiola, N.
    Pont, D.
    Oliveira, J. M.
    Delaigue, O.
    Ferreira, M. T.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 476 : 785 - 794
  • [28] ASSESSMENTS OF CUMULATIVE ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF AGRICULTURAL STRESSORS ON AQUATIC COMMUNTIES: AN ELABORATION OF THE SEDIMENT QUALITY TRIAD
    Luiker, Eric
    Culp, Joseph
    Benoy, Glenn
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 3 (04) : 564 - 566
  • [29] Evaluating the adequacy of a reference-site pool for ecological assessments in environmentally complex regions
    Ode, Peter R.
    Rehn, Andrew C.
    Mazor, Raphael D.
    Schiff', Kenneth C.
    Stein, Eric D.
    May, Jason T.
    Brown, Larry R.
    Herbst, David B.
    Gillett, David
    Lunde, Kevin
    Hawkins, Charles P.
    FRESHWATER SCIENCE, 2016, 35 (01) : 237 - 248
  • [30] USE OF SATELLITE DATA IN MONITORING ECOLOGICAL CONDITION OF URBAN LANDSCAPE
    Filipovich, Vladimir
    Mychak, Anton
    Krylova, Anna
    GEOCONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL III, 2014, : 1061 - 1068