Innate host defenses against Cryptococcus neoformans

被引:0
|
作者
Camaron Hole
Floyd L. Wormley
机构
[1] The University of Texas at San Antonio,Department of Biology
[2] One UTSA Circle,The South Texas Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases
[3] The University of Texas at San Antonio,undefined
[4] One UTSA Circle,undefined
来源
Journal of Microbiology | 2016年 / 54卷
关键词
fungal pathogenesis; host-fungal interactions; fungal immunity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cryptococcus neoformans, the predominant etiological agent of cryptococcosis, can cause life-threatening infections of the central nervous system in immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals. Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is the most common disseminated fungal infection in AIDS patients, and remains the third most common invasive fungal infection among organ transplant recipients. The administration of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has resulted in a decrease in the number of cases of AIDS-related cryptococcosis in developed countries, but in developing countries where HAART is not readily available, Cryptococcus is still a major concern. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of novel therapies and/or vaccines to combat cryptococcosis. Understanding the protective immune responses against Cryptococcus is critical for development of vaccines and immunotherapies to combat cryptococcosis. Consequently, this review focuses on our current knowledge of protective immune responses to C. neoformans, with an emphasis on innate immune responses.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Host innate defenses in the lung: the role of cytokines
    Strieter, RM
    Belperio, JA
    Keane, MP
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 16 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [32] Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and host innate immune defenses against bacterial sepsis
    Calandra, T
    Froidevaux, W
    Martin, C
    Roger, T
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 187 : S385 - S390
  • [33] Challenge of Drosophila melanogaster with Cryptococcus neoformans and role of the innate immune response
    Apidianakis, Y
    Rahme, LG
    Heitman, J
    Ausubel, FM
    Calderwood, SB
    Mylonakis, E
    EUKARYOTIC CELL, 2004, 3 (02) : 413 - 419
  • [34] STING is a negative regulator of innate immune response in Cryptococcus neoformans infection
    Kobayashi, Mutsuki
    Yabe, Rikio
    Wakatsuki, Maki
    Akahori, Yukiko
    Saijo, Shinobu
    CYTOKINE, 2017, 100 : 157 - 157
  • [35] Host Defenses Against Zygomycetes
    Roilides, Emmanuel
    Kontoyiannis, Dimitrios P.
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 54 : S61 - S66
  • [36] Host Defenses Against Cryptococcosis
    Price, Michael S.
    Perfect, John R.
    IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 40 (7-8) : 786 - 808
  • [37] ARE THERE HOST DEFENSES AGAINST CANCER
    SOUTHAM, CM
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1961, 45 (03) : 733 - &
  • [38] Semisynthetic Glycoconjugate Vaccine Candidates against Cryptococcus neoformans
    Crawford, Conor J.
    Liporagi-Lopes, Livia
    Coelho, Carolina
    Santos Jr, Samuel R.
    Nicola, Andre Moraes
    Wear, Maggie P.
    Vij, Raghav
    Oscarson, Stefan
    Casadevall, Arturo
    ACS INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 10 (06): : 2089 - 2100
  • [39] Transcriptional Profiles Elucidate Differential Host Responses to Infection with Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii
    Holcomb, Zachary E.
    Steinbrink, Julie M.
    Zaas, Aimee K.
    Betancourt, Marisol
    Tenor, Jennifer L.
    Toffaletti, Dena L.
    Alspaugh, J. Andrew
    Perfect, John R.
    McClain, Micah T.
    JOURNAL OF FUNGI, 2022, 8 (05)
  • [40] Cryptococcus neoformans
    Mayer, Francois L.
    Kronstad, James W.
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02) : 163 - 164