Crown density assessments, control surveys and reproducibility

被引:0
|
作者
Svein Solberg
Lars Strand
机构
关键词
control; crown density; forest monitoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the quality of crown density data, based on independent, pairwise tree assessments. The data originates from monitoring of forest health (crown condition) in Norway; 250 plots, comprising 12 000 individual trees of Norway spruce, have been reassessed by a single observer during 1990–95. Of the trees, 2300 were controlled more than twice, providing the possibility of evaluating the quality of assessed temporal changes of crown density. True errors (standard deviation) are estimated to be about 10% for single trees and 5% for plot means, while the real standard deviation of the differences were slightly higher. The errors of the temporal changes of crown density were of similar magnitude. Systematic differences in crown density were found between sites and plot types, partly resulting from observer bias. However, the results suggest that observer bias is really the result of each observer's personal style in assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating scat surveys as a tool for population and community assessments
    Paton, Alexandra J.
    Buettel, Jessie C.
    Brook, Barry W.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 49 (03) : 206 - 214
  • [32] Density estimation in wildlife surveys
    Bart, J
    Droege, S
    Geissler, P
    Peterjohn, B
    Ralph, CJ
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2004, 32 (04): : 1242 - 1247
  • [33] Reproducibility of qualitative assessments of temporal lobe atrophy in MRI studies
    Sarria-Estrada, S.
    Acevedo, C.
    Mitjana, R.
    Frascheri, L.
    Siurana, S.
    Auger, C.
    Rovira, A.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2015, 57 (03): : 225 - 228
  • [34] Reproducibility and Suitability of Clinical Assessments of Trunk Flexor and Extensor Muscles
    Christophe, Demoulin
    Delphine, Sac
    Laurent, Serre
    Didier, Maquet
    Jean-Michel, Crielaard
    Vanderthommen, Marc
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2008, 16 (04): : 298 - 308
  • [35] Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments.
    Arce, JC
    Ziebe, S
    Lundin, K
    Janssens, R
    Helmgaard, L
    Sorensen, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S104 - S104
  • [36] Long and short of nerve conduction measures: reproducibility for sequential assessments
    Kimura, J
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 71 (04): : 427 - 430
  • [37] Reproducibility of an image scoring system for crown rump length measurements
    Wanyonyi, S.
    Napolitano, R.
    Ohuma, E.
    Salomon, L.
    Papageorhiou, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 25 - 25
  • [38] Reproducibility, reliability, and regulatory relevance of plant visual injury assessments
    Fellmann, Sebastian
    Duffner, Andreas
    Kirkwood, Ashlee
    Lopez-Mancisidor, Patricia
    Arnie, Joshua
    Krueger, Henry
    du Hoffmann, Gunther
    Wolf, Jeffrey
    Kraetzig, Gwendolin
    Springer, Tim
    Isemer, Rena
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (04) : 915 - 923
  • [39] Magnetogastrography (MGG) reproducibility assessments of gastric emptying on healthy subjects
    de la Roca-Chiapas, J. M.
    Cordova, T.
    Hernandez, E.
    Solorio, S.
    Solis, S.
    Sosa, M.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2007, 28 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [40] Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density
    Jinnan Gao
    Ruth Warren
    Helen Warren-Forward
    John F. Forbes
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 108 : 121 - 127