Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Gstoettner Michaela
Heider Denise
Michael Liebensteiner
Bach Christian Michael
机构
[1] Medical University Innsbruck,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] Orthopedic Hospital Harthausen,undefined
来源
European Spine Journal | 2008年 / 17卷
关键词
Disc arthroplasty; Footprint; Endplate diameter; Lumbar spine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lumbar disc arthroplasty has become a popular modality for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. The dimensions of the implants are based on early published geometrical measurements of vertebrae; the majority of these were cadaver studies. The fit of the prosthesis in the intervertebral space is of utmost importance. An undersized implant may lead to subsidence, loosening and biomechanical failure due to an incorrect center of rotation. The aim of the present study was to measure the dimensions of lumbar vertebrae based on CT scans and assess the accuracy of match in currently available lumbar disc prostheses. A total of 240 endplates of 120 vertebrae were included in the study. The sagittal and mediolateral diameter of the upper and lower endplates were measured using a digital measuring system. For the levels L4/L5 and L5/S1, an inappropriate size match was noted in 98.8% (Prodisc L) and 97.6% (Charite) with regard to the anteroposterior diameter. Mismatch in the anterior mediolateral diameter was noted in 79.3% (Prodisc L) and 51.2% (Charite) while mismatch in the posterior mediolateral diameter was observed in 91.5% (Prodisc L) and 78% (Charite) of the endplates. Surgeons and manufacturers should be aware of the size mismatch of currently available lumbar disc prostheses, which may endanger the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Larger footprints of currently available total disc arthroplasties are required.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
    Gill, Norman W.
    Konitzer, Lisa N.
    Hoppes, Carrie W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (03): : 200 - 200
  • [32] Lumbar total disc replacement
    Grob, D.
    ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [33] Mini-symposium: Frontiers in spine surgery (iii) Total lumbar disc arthroplasty
    Mayer, H. Michael
    Siepe, Christoph
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 21 (01): : 17 - 24
  • [34] Radiologic landmark accuracy for optimum coronal placement of total disc arthroplasty in the lumbar spine
    Mistry, Dinshaw N.
    Robertson, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (04): : 231 - 236
  • [35] Clinical Outcomes After 1 and 2-Level Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty
    Marnay, Thierry P.
    Geneste, Guillaume Y.
    Edgard-Rosa, Gregory W.
    Grau-Ortiz, Martin M.
    Hirsch, Caroline C.
    Negre, Georges G.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2025, 107 (01): : 53 - 65
  • [36] Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty
    Basho, Rahul
    Hood, Kenneth A.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 2 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [37] Significance of Angular Mismatch Between Vertebral Endplate and Prosthetic Endplate in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
    Lee, Chong Suh
    Chung, Sung Soo
    Oh, Sung Kyun
    You, Je Wook
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 183 - 188
  • [38] Lumbar arthroplasty for treatment of primary or recurrent lumbar disc herniation
    Vincent Rossi
    Joseph Maalouly
    John Y. S. Choi
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 1071 - 1077
  • [39] Lumbar arthroplasty for treatment of primary or recurrent lumbar disc herniation
    Rossi, Vincent
    Maalouly, Joseph
    Choi, John Y. S.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (04) : 1071 - 1077
  • [40] The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis
    Cakir, B
    Richter, M
    Käfer, W
    Puhl, W
    Schmidt, R
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 20 (04) : 357 - 364