Sex Differences in Two Event-Related Potentials Components Related to Semantic Priming

被引:0
|
作者
Jérôme Daltrozzo
Norma Wioland
Boris Kotchoubey
机构
[1] University Hospital of Strasbourg,Department of Neurology
[2] Center for Studies of Applied Physiology,Department of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology
[3] Louis Pasteur University of Strasbourg,Département de Neurologie, U.F. 6231
[4] Tuebingen University,undefined
[5] Hôpital Universitaire de Strasbourg,undefined
来源
关键词
Sex; Gender; Semantic priming; ERP; N400;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although sex differences in language processing are well documented in behavioral studies, only a few electrophysiological studies have explored this topic. We analyzed sex differences in two language-related components of event-related potentials (ERPs): the N400 and the Late Positive Complex (LPC). Ten men and 10 women, matched by age and handedness, participated in the study. Two semantic priming paradigms were presented: word pairs (60 congruent and 60 incongruent) and sentences (50 with congruent and 50 with incongruent ending words). In addition, the effect of context was investigated by a comparison between ERP effects obtained in single word priming and sentential priming. The N400 effect was earlier and larger in women, and the LPC effect was larger in men. Furthermore, the LPC effect in men, but not in women, was much larger with sentence priming than with word priming, suggesting that the LPC effect may be more dependent on context in men than in women. The opposite sex difference on the two ERP components indicates different underlying mechanisms. While the LPC effect is thought to be generated by purely explicit mechanisms, such as postlexical integrative processes, the N400 effect may be also governed by prelexical implicit and explicit mechanisms. Our results were consistent with the notion of more automated processing of language in women than in men.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 568
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modulations of event-related potentials by tactile negative priming
    Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
    Naumann, Ewald
    Spence, Charles
    Frings, Christian
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2019, 30 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [42] Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks
    Barnes-Holmes, D
    Staunton, C
    Whelan, R
    Barnes-Holmes, Y
    Commins, S
    Walsh, D
    Stewart, I
    Smeets, PM
    Dymond, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2005, 84 (03) : 417 - 433
  • [43] TOPOGRAPHIC COMPONENTS MODEL FOR EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    MOCKS, J
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (05) : 602 - 602
  • [44] Event-related potentials to event-related words: Grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge
    Barber, Horacio A.
    Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia
    Otten, Leun J.
    Vigliocco, Gabriella
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1332 : 65 - 74
  • [45] SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT AS MEASURED BY AUDITORY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    SHUCARD, DW
    SHUCARD, JL
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 19 (03) : 347 - 347
  • [46] RESPONSE PRIMING AND COMPONENTS OF THE EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL
    GEHRING, W
    GRATTON, G
    COLES, MGH
    DONCHIN, E
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 23 (04) : 437 - 438
  • [47] EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS IN SEMANTIC AND PHONOLOGICAL MATCHING TASKS
    BARRETT, SE
    RUGG, MD
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (05) : 577 - 578
  • [48] Modulation of event-related potentials by semantic priming: Effects of color-cued selective attention
    Kellenbach, ML
    Michie, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (02) : 155 - 173
  • [49] HUMAN SEX DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION PREDICTION: EVIDENCE FROM EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    Ran, Guangming
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2018, 46 (06): : 925 - 934
  • [50] Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials
    Kiefer, M
    Weisbrod, M
    Kern, I
    Maier, S
    Spitzer, M
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 64 (03) : 377 - 408