Further characterization of AFLP® data as a tool in genetic diversity assessments among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines

被引:0
|
作者
M. Vuylsteke
R. Mank
B. Brugmans
P. Stam
M. Kuiper
机构
[1] Keygene N.V.,Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Department of Plant Sciences
[2] Wageningen Agricultural University,undefined
来源
Molecular Breeding | 2000年 / 6卷
关键词
AFLP®; genetic diversity; methylation AFLP®; polymorphism information content; maize;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
AFLP® markers generated by CNG methylation sensitive (PstI/MseI) and CNG methylation insensitive (EcoRI/MseI) enzyme combinations and AFLP markers collected from hypomethylated (PstI/MseI) and hypermethylated (mPstI/MseI) regions were compared for their polymorphism information content, sampling variance and patterns of genetic diversity in a representative sample of 33 inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). We demonstrate that the mean polymorphism information content generated by sets of PstI/MseI and mPstI/MseI markers (0.38) is significantly higher than by sets ofEcoRI/MseI markers (0.33). Also the sampling variance highlighted the distinctive nature of the (m)PstI/MseI markers: to achieve a mean standard deviation of 5% in the estimation of genetic distance among the 33 inbreds, the PstI/MseI and mPstI/MseI marker sets (135 and 129 markers, respectively) are clearly smaller than the EcoRI/MseI marker set (173 markers). A further minimizing of the sampling variance of AFLP data in the estimation of genetic similarities was obtained by reducing marker information redundancy by selecting markers evenly distributed over each chromosome: a set of only 106 AFLP markers, sampled conditionally on their genetic map position, was required for a mean standard deviation of 5% in the estimation of genetic distance among the 33 inbreds.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 276
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Genetic diversity among maize (Zea mays) inbred lines for methionine and yield associated traits
    Devi, Veena
    Sethi, Mehak
    Kaur, Charanjeet
    Raigar, Om Prakash
    Kumar, Ramesh
    Chaudhary, Dharam Paul
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 94 (02): : 216 - 219
  • [12] Advancement of AFLP Techniques in Some Maize (Zea Mays L.) Lines
    Pál Pepó
    Zoltán Bódi
    [J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2006, 34 : 605 - 608
  • [13] Advancement of AFLP techniques in some maize (Zea mays L.) lines
    Pepó, P
    Bódi, Z
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 34 (01) : 605 - 608
  • [14] Evaluation of Hbr (MITE) markers for assessment of genetic relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines
    A. M. Casa
    S. E. Mitchell
    O. S. Smith
    J. C. Register III
    S. R. Wessler
    S. Kresovich
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 104 : 104 - 110
  • [15] Evaluation of Hbr (MITE) markers for assessment of genetic relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines
    Casa, AM
    Mitchell, SE
    Smith, OS
    Register, JC
    Wessler, SR
    Kresovich, S
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2002, 104 (01) : 104 - 110
  • [16] Water logging tolerance in inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.)
    Tripathi, S
    Warsi, MZK
    Verma, SS
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 31 (1-2) : 221 - 226
  • [17] Water Logging Tolerance in Inbred Lines of Maize (Zea mays L.)
    Shailesh Tripathi
    M. Z. K. Warsi
    S. S. Verma
    [J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2003, 31 : 221 - 226
  • [18] THE YIELD CAPACITY OF MAIZE ISONUCLEAR INBRED LINES (ZEA MAYS L.)
    Racz, Camelia
    Has, Ioan
    Has, Voichita
    Copandean, Ana
    [J]. ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2013, 30 : 91 - 98
  • [19] Genetic Variability of some Maize Inbred Lines (Zea mays L.) in Agroecological Conditions of Kosovo
    Aliu, Sali
    Fetahu, Shukri
    Salillari, Adem
    Kaciu, Skender
    [J]. NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2009, 37 (01) : 209 - 214
  • [20] Studies on heterosis and its relation to genetic divergence in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines
    Datta, D
    Mukherjee, BK
    Das, SP
    Barua, NS
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 32 (04) : 443 - 450