Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Determine the Value of Prophylaxis Relative to On-Demand Treatment in Hemophilia A and Emicizumab versus Replacement Therapy in the Greek Healthcare Setting

被引:0
|
作者
George Gourzoulidis
Garyfallia Stefanou
Marina Economou
Sofia Vakalopoulou
George Filippidis
George Soultatis
Dimitrios Kontos
Sotiria Tzima
Fotis Ntemousis
Angeliki Fassa
Georgia Kourlaba
机构
[1] University of West Attica,Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health
[2] ECONCARE LP,1st Pediatric Department
[3] Aristotle University Thessaloniki,2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine
[4] Hippocratio Hospital,undefined
[5] Hippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki,undefined
[6] Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,undefined
[7] Greek Haemophilia Society,undefined
[8] Laiko General Hospital,undefined
[9] Panhellenic Pharmaceutical Association,undefined
[10] Roche Hellas S.A,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 85
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Cost-effectiveness analysis of primary prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment for individuals with severe hemophilia based on the Joint Outcome Study
    Matthew, P.
    Boer, R.
    Lalla, A.
    Preblick, R.
    Pocoski, J.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2010, 16 : 58 - 58
  • [12] Cost-effectiveness analysis of low-dose prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment for moderate-to-severe hemophilia A in India
    Seth, Tulika
    Garg, Kapil
    Mandal, Prakas Kumar
    Datta, Anupam
    Verma, Shailendra
    Hanagavadi, Suresh
    Thota, Usha Rani
    HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [13] ESTIMATING UTILITY WEIGHTS IN HEMOPHILIA A PATIENTS WITH INHIBITORS USING THE EQ-5D-5L TOOL: A COMPARISON OF EMICIZUMAB PROPHYLAXIS VERSUS ON-DEMAND TREATMENT WITH BYPASSING AGENTS
    Park, S.
    Baik, D.
    Lee, H.
    Han, J. W.
    Park, Y. S.
    Kim, H. C.
    Kang, H. Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S867 - S867
  • [14] A Comparison of the Incidence Rate for Joint Bleeding and FVIII Consumption between On-Demand versus Prophylaxis Factor VIII Replacement Therapy and the Direct Cost of Prophylaxis Treatment in Severe Haemophilia A Patients
    Jamal, Munirah
    Sathar, Jameela
    Jamari, Jamaliah
    Saffian, Shamin Mohd
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 30 (01): : 129 - 136
  • [15] Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran
    Rasekh, Hamid Reza
    Imani, Ali
    Karimi, Mehran
    Golestani, Mina
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 3 : 207 - 212
  • [16] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF IMMUNE TOLERANCE INDUCTION (ITI) THERAPY VERSUS ON-DEMAND TREATMENT WITH RECOMBINANT FVII (RFVIIA) FOR HEMOPHILIA A WITH HIGH TITER INHIBITORS IN IRAN
    Imani, A.
    Rasekh, H.
    Golestani, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A680 - A680
  • [17] Dutasteride plus Tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus Tamsulosin Monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting
    Geitona, Maria
    Karabela, Pinelopi
    Katsoulis, Ioannis A.
    Kousoulakou, Hara
    Lyberopoulou, Eleni
    Bitros, Eleftherios
    Xaplanteris, Loukas
    Papanicolaou, Sotiria
    BMC UROLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [18] Dutasteride plus Tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus Tamsulosin Monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting
    Maria Geitona
    Pinelopi Karabela
    Ioannis A Katsoulis
    Hara Kousoulakou
    Eleni Lyberopoulou
    Eleftherios Bitros
    Loukas Xaplanteris
    Sotiria Papanicolaou
    BMC Urology, 14
  • [19] Re: Dutasteride plus Tamsulosin Fixed-Dose Combination First-Line Therapy versus Tamsulosin Monotherapy in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Budget Impact Analysis in the Greek Healthcare Setting Editorial Comment
    Kashyap, M.
    Belleville, S.
    Mulsant, B. H.
    Hilmer, S. Nl
    Paquette, A.
    Tu, L. M.
    Tannenbaum, C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (05): : 1354 - 1355