The doctrine of equivalents lives - U.S. Supreme Court reverses Federal Court

被引：0

作者：

Silverman A.B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Eckert Seamans Cherin and Mellott, LLC, Pittsburgh, PA 15219

来源：

JOM | 2002年 / 54卷 / 8期

关键词：

Supreme Court; Appellate Court; Patent Claim; Patent Owner; Patent Examiner;

D O I：

10.1007/BF02711871

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：64 / 64

共 50 条

[31] MOOTNESS DOCTRINE IN SUPREME COURT
不详
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1974, 88 (02) : 373 - 395
[32] Unsought Responsibility: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Politics of Passive Writing
Skinner, Daniel
Pludwin, Steven
[J]. POLITY, 2013, 45 (04) : 499 - 524
[33] U.S. Supreme Court justices (Facts and figures, 1789 to the present)
不详
[J]. AMERICAN HISTORY, 2004, 39 (02) : 58 - 58
[34] The doctrine of precedent in the Supreme Court
Legarre, Santiago
[J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2017, 15 (02): : 535 - 538
[35] Locating U.S. Solicitors General in the Supreme Court's Policy Space
Hansford, Thomas G.
Depaoli, Sarah
Canelo, Kayla S.
[J]. PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2019, 49 (04) : 855 - 869
[36] Media Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court: How Do Journalists Assess the Importance of Court Decisions?
Sill, Kaitlyn L.
Metzgar, Emily T.
Rouse, Stella M.
[J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2013, 30 (01) : 58 - 80
[37] The Overseas Exchange of Human Rights Jurisprudence: The U.S. Supreme Court in the European Court of Human Rights
de Wolf, Antenor Hallo
Wallace, Donald H.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW, 2009, 19 (03) : 287 - 307
[38] The Self-Authorization of the Agents. The European Court of Justice in Comparison to U.S. Supreme Court
Hoepner, Martin
[J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VERGLEICHENDE POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT, 2010, 4 (01): : 178 - 181
[39] THE U.S. CONSTITUTION'S COMMERCE CLAUSE, THE SUPREME COURT, AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Rutkow, Lainie
Vernick, Jon S.
[J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2011, 126 (05) : 750 - 753
[40] FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, LEGITIMACY AND CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Neiva Belchior, Germana Parente
[J]. REVISTA DIREITO E LIBERDADE, 2008, 8 (01) : 205 - 226

← 1 2 3 4 5 →