Stress response in E. coli exposed to different pharmaceuticals

被引:0
|
作者
Hong N.-H. [1 ]
Sekhon S.S. [2 ]
Ahn J.-Y. [2 ]
Le T.-H. [1 ]
Min J. [1 ]
Kim Y.-H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Chonbuk National University, 664-14 Duckjin-dong, Jeonju
[2] Department of Microbiology, Chungbuk National University, 52 Naesudong-Ro, Heungduk-Gu, Cheongju
关键词
E; coli; Gene expression patterns; Pharmaceuticals; Stress responsive genes;
D O I
10.1007/s13530-014-0194-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hazardous effect of four widely consumed pharmaceuticals (caffeine, ibuprofen, aspirin and tetracycline) has been studied. Escherichia coli has been used as a comparison organism for the four stress responsive genes, grpE, recA, katG and fabA, which are useful biomarkers of the protein damage, DNA damage, oxidative damage and membrane damage caused by these pharmaceuticals, respectively. The growth rate has been found to depend upon the time of exposure and the concentration of pharmaceuticals. The expression levels of these four genes, quantified by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, show different responsive patterns when the E. coli cultures were under stressful conditions caused by exposure to these four pharmaceuticals in different concentrations. The stress responsive gene grpE is more sensitive to aspirin and tetracycline, recA is responsive to caffeine and aspirin, katG is responsive to ibuprofen only whereas fabA is responsive to tetracycline only. The extent of stress responsive effect caused by these pharmaceuticals has been analyzed and most responsive genes have been identified for each pharmaceutical. © 2014, Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Mysterious E. Coli
    Dhillon, Amrita
    Kahlon, Arunpreet
    Kahlon, Arundeep
    Housam, Hegazy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S110 - S110
  • [32] E. coli Happens
    Mermelstein, Neil H.
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 71 (01) : 60 - 63
  • [33] Chasing E. coli
    Swannell, Cate
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 205 (06) : C1 - C2
  • [34] Spectroscopic Imaging for Detection and Discrimination of Different E. coli Strains
    Gilbert, Michael K.
    Frick, Caleb
    Wodowski, Andrew
    Vogt, Frank
    [J]. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2009, 63 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [35] The E. coli molecular phenotype under different growth conditions
    Mehmet U. Caglar
    John R. Houser
    Craig S. Barnhart
    Daniel R. Boutz
    Sean M. Carroll
    Aurko Dasgupta
    Walter F. Lenoir
    Bartram L. Smith
    Viswanadham Sridhara
    Dariya K. Sydykova
    Drew Vander Wood
    Christopher J. Marx
    Edward M. Marcotte
    Jeffrey E. Barrick
    Claus O. Wilke
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [36] E. coli vaccine
    Kent, H
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (05) : 781 - 781
  • [37] Rewiring E. coli
    Allison Doerr
    [J]. Nature Methods, 2008, 5 : 464 - 465
  • [38] E. coli: the computer
    William Wells
    [J]. Genome Biology, 1 (1):
  • [39] E. coli High
    Lewis, Tanya
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2020, 322 (01) : 16 - 17
  • [40] E. coli on the March
    Gorman, Christine
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2011, 305 (02) : 26 - 26