HierFlat: flattened hierarchies for improving top-down hierarchical classification

被引:0
|
作者
Naik A. [1 ]
Rangwala H. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Error propagation; Flattening; Hierarchical classification; Hybrid prediction; Inconsistency; Logistic regression; Support vector machine;
D O I
10.1007/s41060-017-0070-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Large-scale classification of structured data where classes are organized in a hierarchical structure is an important area of research. Top-down approaches that leverage the hierarchy during the learning and prediction phase are efficient for solving large-scale hierarchical classification. However, accuracy of top-down approaches is poor due to error propagation, i.e., prediction errors made at higher levels in the hierarchy cannot be corrected at lower levels. One of the main reasons behind errors at the higher levels is the presence of inconsistent nodes that are introduced due to the arbitrary process of creating these hierarchies by domain experts. In this paper, we propose two different data-driven approaches (local and global) for hierarchical structure modification that identifies and flattens inconsistent nodes present in the hierarchy. Our extensive empirical evaluation of the proposed approaches on several image and text datasets with varying distribution of features, classes and training instances per class shows improved classification performance over competing hierarchical modification approaches. Specifically, we see an improvement up to 7% in Macro-F1 score with our best approach over best top-down baseline. We also show that our modified hierarchy leads to improved classification performance for classes with few training samples in comparison with flat approach. Further, our experimental evaluation shows that combining the prediction from flat and hierarchical model in an ensemble setting results in better classification performance. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 208
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving Top-Down Sequence Coverage with Targeted Fragment Matching
    Robey, Matthew T.
    Durbin, Kenneth R.
    [J]. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024, 35 (12) : 3296 - 3300
  • [32] The top-down universe
    Minkel, JR
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2002, 175 (2355) : 28 - 31
  • [33] Top-down proteomics
    Roberts, David S.
    Loo, Joseph A.
    Tsybin, Yury O.
    Liu, Xiaowen
    Wu, Si
    Chamot-Rooke, Julia
    Agar, Jeffrey N.
    Pasa-Tolic, Ljiljana
    Smith, Lloyd M.
    Ge, Ying
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [34] ON TOP-DOWN SPLAYING
    MAKINEN, E
    [J]. BIT, 1987, 27 (03): : 330 - 339
  • [35] Top-down savings
    Uzych, L
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1996, 26 (05) : 3 - 3
  • [36] Top-down research
    Greenberg, Charles B.
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2006, 84 (45) : 3 - 4
  • [37] Top-down safety
    Keeler, A
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEER-LONDON, 1999, (692): : 15 - 15
  • [38] TOP-DOWN DESIGN
    SHANDLE, J
    [J]. ELECTRONIC DESIGN, 1995, 43 (12) : 18 - 18
  • [39] Top-down NANOMANUFACTURING
    Imboden, Matthias
    Bishop, David
    [J]. PHYSICS TODAY, 2014, 67 (12) : 45 - 50
  • [40] The Trouble with Top-Down
    Van Tassell, Rebecca
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2014, 71 (08) : 76 - 78