Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. are dependent on plant P nutrition

被引:0
|
作者
Roseline Remans
Anja Croonenborghs
Roldan Torres Gutierrez
Jan Michiels
Jos Vanderleyden
机构
[1] K.U. Leuven,Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics
来源
European Journal of Plant Pathology | 2007年 / 119卷
关键词
Phosphorus deficiency; Nodulation; Common bean; Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; Phytohormones;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have shown potential to enhance nodulation of legumes when coinoculated with Rhizobium. To optimize the efficiency of these Rhizobium-PGPR-host plant interactions, unravelling the underlying mechanisms and analyzing the influence of specific environmental conditions is crucial. In this work the effect of four PGPR strains on the symbiotic interaction between Rhizobium and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was studied under deficient versus sufficient phosphorus supply. It was observed that the effect on nodulation of three out of four PGPR tested was strongly dependent on P nutrition. Further, the use of specific PGPR mutant strains indicated that bacterial indole-3-acetic-acid production (IAA) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity play an important role in the host nodulation response, particularly under low P conditions. Moreover, it was shown that the differential response to PGPR under low versus high P conditions was associated with changes in the host hormone sensitivity for nodulation induced under P deficiency. These findings contribute to the understanding of the interplay between Rhizobium, PGPR and the plant host under different environmental settings.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the growth and quality of strawberries
    Pii, Y.
    Graf, H.
    Valentinuzzi, F.
    Cesco, S.
    Mimmo, T.
    VIII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MINERAL NUTRITION OF FRUIT CROPS, 2018, 1217 : 231 - 238
  • [22] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote plant size inequality
    Gange, Alan C.
    Gadhave, Kiran R.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [23] Using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth
    Grobelak, A.
    Napora, A.
    Kacprzak, M.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 84 : 22 - 28
  • [24] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote plant size inequality
    Alan C. Gange
    Kiran R. Gadhave
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [25] Impact of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on plant nutrition and root characteristics: Current perspective
    Khoso, Muneer Ahmed
    Wagan, Sindho
    Alam, Intikhab
    Hussain, Amjad
    Ali, Qurban
    Saha, Sudipta
    Poudel, Tika Ram
    Manghwar, Hakim
    Liu, Fen
    PLANT STRESS, 2024, 11
  • [26] Effect of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria on plant hormone homeostasis
    Tsukanova, K. A.
    Chebotar, V. K.
    Meyer, J. J. M.
    Bibikova, T. N.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 113 : 91 - 102
  • [27] IRON REGULATION OF PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA
    KLOEPPER, JW
    SCHROTH, MN
    LEONG, J
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 71 (02) : 231 - 232
  • [28] Current Perspectives on Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
    Javid A. Parray
    Sumira Jan
    Azra N. Kamili
    Raies A. Qadri
    Dilfuza Egamberdieva
    Parvaiz Ahmad
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2016, 35 : 877 - 902
  • [29] Ameliorative effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.)
    Molkabadi, Reza Salehi
    Alian, Mina
    Bonito, Gregory
    Ghasemi, Kamran
    Mirtalebi, Maryam
    Raouf-Fard, Fatemeh
    Ramezanian, Asghar
    ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2023, 110 (04) : 347 - 356
  • [30] PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA ON CANOLA (RAPESEED)
    KLOEPPER, JW
    HUME, DJ
    SCHER, FM
    SINGLETON, C
    TIPPING, B
    LALIBERTE, M
    FRAULEY, K
    KUTCHAW, T
    SIMONSON, C
    LIFSHITZ, R
    ZALESKA, I
    LEE, L
    PLANT DISEASE, 1988, 72 (01) : 42 - 46